Suppr超能文献

左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统与小剂量复方口服避孕药治疗子宫肌瘤相关月经过多的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a low-dose combined oral contraceptive for fibroid-related menorrhagia.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Feb;112(2):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with that of a low-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) in reducing fibroid-related menorrhagia.

METHODS

In this single-center, open, randomized clinical trial, 58 women with menorrhagia who desired contraception were randomized to receive a LNG-IUS or COC. The outcomes included treatment failure, defined as the need for another treatment; menstrual blood loss (MBL) by the alkaline hematin method and a pictorial assessment chart (PBAC); hemoglobin levels; and "lost days."

RESULTS

Treatment failed in 6 women (23.1%) in the LNG-IUS group and 11 (37.9%) in the COC group, for a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.17-1.17, P=0.101). Using the alkaline hematin test, the reduction of MBL was significantly greater in the LNG-IUS group (90.9% ± 12.8% vs 13.4% ± 11.1%; P<0.001). Using PBAC scores, the reduction was also significantly greater in the LNG-IUS group (88.0% ± 16.5% vs 53.5% ± 5 1.2%; P=0.02). Moreover, hemoglobin levels increased from 9.7 ± 1.9g/dL to 11.7 ± 1.2g/dL (P<0.001) and lost days decreased from 8.2 ± 3.3 days to 1.3 ± 1.5 days (P=0.003) in the LNG-IUS group.

CONCLUSION

Although the rate of treatment failure was similar in both groups, the LNG-IUS was more effective in reducing MBL than the COC in women with fibroid-related menorrhagia.

摘要

目的

比较左炔诺孕酮宫内释放系统(LNG-IUS)与低剂量复方口服避孕药(COC)减少子宫肌瘤相关月经过多的疗效。

方法

这是一项单中心、开放、随机临床试验,纳入 58 例有避孕需求且月经过多的子宫肌瘤妇女,随机接受 LNG-IUS 或 COC 治疗。主要结局为治疗失败,定义为需要其他治疗;碱性血红素法和图片评估图表(PBAC)评估的月经出血量(MBL);血红蛋白水平;以及“失血量”。

结果

LNG-IUS 组有 6 例(23.1%)治疗失败,COC 组有 11 例(37.9%)治疗失败,风险比为 0.46(95%CI,0.17-1.17,P=0.101)。使用碱性血红素试验,LNG-IUS 组 MBL 减少率显著大于 COC 组(90.9%±12.8% vs. 13.4%±11.1%;P<0.001)。使用 PBAC 评分,LNG-IUS 组 MBL 减少率也显著大于 COC 组(88.0%±16.5% vs. 53.5%±5.2%;P=0.02)。此外,LNG-IUS 组血红蛋白水平从 9.7±1.9g/dL 升高至 11.7±1.2g/dL(P<0.001),失血量从 8.2±3.3 天减少至 1.3±1.5 天(P=0.003)。

结论

尽管两组治疗失败率相似,但 LNG-IUS 减少子宫肌瘤相关月经过多的 MBL 效果优于 COC。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验