Department Information and Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):342-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
Injury analysis following a vehicle crash is one of the most important research areas. However, most injury analyses have focused on one-dimensional injury variables, such as the AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale) or the IIS (Injury Impairment Scale), at a time in relation to various traffic accident factors. However, these studies cannot reflect the various injury phenomena that appear simultaneously. In this paper, we apply quantification method II to the NASS (National Automotive Sampling System) CDS (Crashworthiness Data System) to find the relationship between the categorical injury phenomena, such as the injury scale, injury position, and injury type, and the various traffic accident condition factors, such as speed, collision direction, vehicle type, and seat position. Our empirical analysis indicated the importance of safety devices, such as restraint equipment and airbags. In addition, we found that narrow impact, ejection, air bag deployment, and higher speed are associated with more severe than minor injury to the thigh, ankle, and leg in terms of dislocation, abrasion, or laceration.
车辆碰撞后的损伤分析是最重要的研究领域之一。然而,大多数损伤分析都集中在一维损伤变量上,例如 AIS(简明损伤量表)或 IIS(损伤损伤量表),同时与各种交通事故因素有关。然而,这些研究无法反映同时出现的各种损伤现象。在本文中,我们将量化方法 II 应用于 NASS(国家汽车抽样系统)CDS(耐撞性数据系统),以发现分类损伤现象(如损伤量表、损伤位置和损伤类型)与各种交通事故条件因素(如速度、碰撞方向、车辆类型和座椅位置)之间的关系。我们的实证分析表明了约束设备和安全气囊等安全装置的重要性。此外,我们发现,在发生脱位、擦伤或撕裂伤时,窄冲击、弹射、安全气囊展开和更高的速度与大腿、脚踝和腿部的轻伤相比,与更严重的损伤有关。