比较肌肉功能性电刺激与传统自行车运动对心力衰竭患者内皮和功能状态指标的影响。
Comparison of muscle functional electrical stimulation to conventional bicycle exercise on endothelium and functional status indices in patients with heart failure.
机构信息
Cardiology Department and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Athens General Hospital G. Gennimatas, Athens, Greece.
出版信息
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 1;106(11):1621-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.040. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
The aim of this prospective, open-label, cohort study was to compare the effect of muscle functional electrical stimulation (FES) on endothelial function to that of conventional bicycle training. Eligible patients were those with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure symptoms and ejection fractions ≤ 0.35. Two physical conditioning programs were delivered: FES of the muscles of the lower limbs and bicycle training, each lasting for 6 weeks, with a 6-week washout period between them. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and other parameters were assessed before and after FES and the bicycle training program. FES resulted in a significant improvement in FMD, which increased from 5.9 ± 0.5% to 7.7 ± 0.5% (95% confidence interval for the difference 1.5% to 2.3%, p < 0.001). Bicycle training also resulted in a substantial improvement of endothelial function. FMD increased from 6.2 ± 0.4% to 9.2 ± 0.4% (95% confidence interval for the difference 2.5% to 3.5%, p < 0.001). FES was associated with a 41% relative increase in FMD, compared to 57% with bicycle exercise (95% confidence interval for the difference between the relative changes 1.2% to 30.5%, p = 0.034). This resulted in attaining a significantly higher FMD value after bicycle training compared to FES (9.2 ± 0.4% vs 7.7 ± 0.5%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the effect of muscle FES in patients with heart failure on endothelial function, although not equivalent to that of conventional exercise, is substantial. Muscle FES protocols may prove very useful in the treatment of patients with heart failure who cannot or will not adhere to conventional exercise programs.
本前瞻性、开放标签、队列研究的目的是比较肌肉功能性电刺激 (FES) 对内皮功能的影响与传统自行车训练的影响。符合条件的患者为纽约心脏协会 (NYHA) 心功能 II 或 III 级心力衰竭症状和射血分数≤0.35 的患者。进行了两种身体调节方案:下肢肌肉 FES 和自行车训练,每个方案持续 6 周,其间有 6 周的洗脱期。在 FES 和自行车训练计划前后评估肱动脉血流介导的扩张 (FMD) 和其他参数。FES 导致 FMD 显著改善,从 5.9±0.5%增加到 7.7±0.5%(差异的 95%置信区间为 1.5%至 2.3%,p<0.001)。自行车训练也显著改善了内皮功能。FMD 从 6.2±0.4%增加到 9.2±0.4%(差异的 95%置信区间为 2.5%至 3.5%,p<0.001)。与自行车运动相比,FES 使 FMD 相对增加了 41%,而自行车运动使 FMD 相对增加了 57%(差异的 95%置信区间为 1.2%至 30.5%,p=0.034)。这导致在自行车训练后 FMD 值显著高于 FES(9.2±0.4%比 7.7±0.5%,p<0.001)。总之,心力衰竭患者肌肉 FES 对内皮功能的影响虽然不及传统运动,但效果显著。肌肉 FES 方案可能对无法或不愿意坚持传统运动方案的心力衰竭患者的治疗非常有用。