Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari, Athens, Greece.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;68(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.08.010.
Because of their frequent isolation in the routine laboratory and their increasing clinical significance, fast and accurate species identification of staphylococci may be required; this can only be achieved by automated systems. A total of 147 clinical isolates (52 Staphylococcus aureus, 50 Staphylococcus epidermidis, and 45 other coagulase-negative staphylococci [CoNS]) were first identified by molecular methodology and then comparatively tested by Vitek 2 (new colorimetric identification card) and Phoenix using the novel 0.25 McFarland and the standard 0.50 McFarland inoculum protocols. All S. aureus isolates were accurately identified. Vitek 2 identified correctly all S. epidermidis and 93.3% of the other CoNS, whereas the respective rates were 86% and 82.2% for Phoenix's standard and 92% and 82.2% for the novel protocol. It appears that both systems provide excellent identification of S. aureus, but Vitek 2 recognizes CoNS species more accurately than Phoenix. The 0.25 McFarland protocol does not improve system performance.
由于葡萄球菌经常在常规实验室中被隔离,并且其临床意义日益增加,因此可能需要快速准确地对葡萄球菌进行种属鉴定;这只能通过自动化系统来实现。首先,通过分子方法对 147 株临床分离株(52 株金黄色葡萄球菌、50 株表皮葡萄球菌和 45 株其他凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌[CoNS])进行鉴定,然后使用新型 0.25 McFarland 和标准 0.50 McFarland 接种物方案,通过 Vitek 2(新型比色鉴定卡)和 Phoenix 对其进行比较测试。所有金黄色葡萄球菌分离株均被准确鉴定。Vitek 2 正确鉴定了所有表皮葡萄球菌和 93.3%的其他 CoNS,而 Phoenix 的标准协议和新型协议的相应鉴定率分别为 86%和 82.2%。似乎这两个系统都能很好地鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌,但 Vitek 2 比 Phoenix 更准确地识别 CoNS 种属。0.25 McFarland 方案不会提高系统性能。