Kulka P J, Lauven P M, Schüttler J, Apffelstaedt C
Institute for Anaesthesiology, University of Bonn, Federal Republic of Germany.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1990;92:90-5; discussion 107. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03193.x.
In a randomised clinical study, two total intravenous anaesthesia techniques for microlaryngoscopic laser surgery were compared. After an induction dose of 100 mg methohexital, Group I received a maintenance infusion of 10 mg.min-1. In Group II anaesthesia was obtained by 15 mg midazolam followed by 0.1 mg.min-1 continuously and terminated by the injection of flumazenil. For analgesia 5 mg alfentanil were administered. Opiate-induced respiratory depression was antagonised by 0.08 to 0.12 mg naloxone. Prior to, during, and after surgery, adrenergic response was assessed by HPLC-analysis of blood taken from a peripheral vein. Haemodynamic responses to the operation and during the post-operative period were almost identical in both groups. In Group I, the mean recovery period of 14 min was significantly longer than in Group II (9 min), where patients received a mean dose of 0.53 mg (+/- 0.15) flumazenil. Resedation could be observed in all patients receiving flumazenil within 60 min after antagonisation, which was associated with a mean decrease in O2-saturation from 95% to 88%. There was no difference in epinephrine and norepinephrine blood levels between the two groups prior to and during anaesthesia. In all patients, arousal was associated with a significant increase in the epinephrine plasma concentration. While blood levels in Group I decreased during the post-operative period to levels prior to surgery, the concentrations in Group II remained elevated. In one patient who received no naloxone, the reversal of midazolam action induced a 16-fold increase in catecholamine levels (from 50 to 800 ng.l-1) associated with a tachycardia of 170 b.min-1 and hypertension of 160 mmHg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项随机临床研究中,比较了用于显微喉镜激光手术的两种全静脉麻醉技术。给予100mg美索比妥诱导剂量后,第一组接受10mg·min⁻¹的维持输注。第二组通过15mg咪达唑仑诱导麻醉,随后持续给予0.1mg·min⁻¹,并通过注射氟马西尼终止麻醉。给予5mg阿芬太尼用于镇痛。0.08至0.12mg纳洛酮拮抗阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制。在手术前、手术期间和手术后,通过对取自外周静脉的血液进行高效液相色谱分析来评估肾上腺素能反应。两组对手术及术后期间的血流动力学反应几乎相同。第一组的平均恢复时间为14分钟,显著长于第二组(9分钟),第二组患者平均接受了0.53mg(±0.15)氟马西尼。在拮抗后60分钟内,所有接受氟马西尼的患者均出现了再镇静,这与平均氧饱和度从95%降至88%相关。麻醉前和麻醉期间两组之间肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的血药浓度无差异。在所有患者中,苏醒与肾上腺素血浆浓度的显著升高相关。第一组患者术后血药浓度降至手术前水平,而第二组患者的浓度仍保持升高。在一名未接受纳洛酮的患者中,咪达唑仑作用的逆转导致儿茶酚胺水平增加了16倍(从50至800ng·l⁻¹),伴有心率170次·min⁻¹和血压160mmHg的升高。(摘要截取自250字)