• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与食管压力相比,利用鼻气流对阻塞性和中枢性呼吸浅慢进行自动无创鉴别。

Automatic non-invasive differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas with nasal airflow compared to esophageal pressure.

作者信息

Morgenstern C, Schwaibold M, Randerath W, Bolz A, Jane R

机构信息

Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC), Dept. ESAII, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Baldiri i Reixach 4, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:6142-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627787.

DOI:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627787
PMID:21097144
Abstract

The differentiation of obstructive and central respiratory events is a major challenge in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing. Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the gold-standard method to identify these events but its invasiveness deters its usage in clinical routine. Flattening patterns appear in the airflow signal during episodes of inspiratory flow limitation (IFL) and have been shown with invasive techniques to be useful to differentiate between central and obstructive hypopneas. In this study we present a new method for the automatic non-invasive differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas solely with nasal airflow. An overall of 36 patients underwent full night polysomnography with systematic Pes recording and a total of 1069 hypopneas were manually scored by human experts to create a gold-standard annotation set. Features were automatically extracted from the nasal airflow signal to train and test our automatic classifier (Discriminant Analysis). Flattening patterns were non-invasively assessed in the airflow signal using spectral and time analysis. The automatic non-invasive classifier obtained a sensitivity of 0.71 and an accuracy of 0.69, similar to the results obtained with a manual non-invasive classification algorithm. Hence, flattening airflow patterns seem promising for the non-invasive differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.

摘要

阻塞性和中枢性呼吸事件的鉴别是睡眠呼吸障碍诊断中的一项重大挑战。食管压力(Pes)测量是识别这些事件的金标准方法,但其侵入性阻碍了其在临床常规中的应用。吸气流量受限(IFL)发作期间气流信号会出现平坦模式,并且已通过侵入性技术证明其有助于区分中枢性和阻塞性呼吸暂停低通气。在本研究中,我们提出了一种仅利用鼻气流自动无创鉴别阻塞性和中枢性呼吸暂停低通气的新方法。总共36名患者接受了整夜多导睡眠监测,并系统记录了Pes,人类专家对总共1069次呼吸暂停低通气进行了人工评分,以创建一个金标准注释集。从鼻气流信号中自动提取特征,以训练和测试我们的自动分类器(判别分析)。使用频谱和时间分析对气流信号中的平坦模式进行无创评估。自动无创分类器的灵敏度为0.71,准确率为0.69,与手动无创分类算法的结果相似。因此,气流平坦模式在阻塞性和中枢性呼吸暂停低通气的无创鉴别方面似乎很有前景。

相似文献

1
Automatic non-invasive differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas with nasal airflow compared to esophageal pressure.与食管压力相比,利用鼻气流对阻塞性和中枢性呼吸浅慢进行自动无创鉴别。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:6142-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627787.
2
An invasive and a noninvasive approach for the automatic differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.一种用于自动区分阻塞性和中枢性呼吸暂停的有创和无创方法。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Aug;57(8):1927-36. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2047505. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
3
Feasibility of noninvasive single-channel automated differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas with nasal airflow.使用鼻气流无创单通道自动化区分阻塞性和中枢性呼吸暂停的可行性。
Respiration. 2013;85(4):312-8. doi: 10.1159/000342010. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
4
Automatic differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas with esophageal pressure measurement during sleep.睡眠期间通过食管压力测量对阻塞性和中枢性呼吸浅慢进行自动鉴别。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:7102-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332900.
5
Evaluation of a noninvasive algorithm for differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas.评估一种用于区分阻塞性和中枢性低通气的无创算法。
Sleep. 2013 Mar 1;36(3):363-8. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2450.
6
Relative prolongation of inspiratory time predicts high versus low resistance categorization of hypopneas.吸气时间相对延长可预测低通气为高阻力或低阻力分类。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Apr 15;8(2):177-85. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1774.
7
Use of Chest Wall EMG to Classify Hypopneas as Obstructive or Central.使用胸壁肌电图对低通气进行阻塞性或中枢性分类。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 May 15;14(5):725-733. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7092.
8
Comparison of nasal prong pressure and thermistor measurements for detecting respiratory events during sleep.鼻导管压力与热敏电阻测量用于睡眠期间呼吸事件检测的比较。
Respiration. 2004 Jul-Aug;71(4):385-90. doi: 10.1159/000079644.
9
Diagnosis of sleep apnea by automatic analysis of nasal pressure and forced oscillation impedance.通过鼻压力和强迫振荡阻抗的自动分析诊断睡眠呼吸暂停。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr 1;165(7):940-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2106018.
10
Thermal infrared imaging: a novel method to monitor airflow during polysomnography.热红外成像:一种监测多导睡眠图中气流的新方法。
Sleep. 2009 Nov;32(11):1521-7. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.11.1521.

引用本文的文献

1
Endotyping Sleep Apnea One Breath at a Time: An Automated Approach for Separating Obstructive from Central Sleep-disordered Breathing.逐个呼吸进行睡眠呼吸暂停分型:一种自动区分阻塞性和中枢性睡眠呼吸障碍的方法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 15;204(12):1452-1462. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202011-4055OC.
2
Frequency of flow limitation using airflow shape.气流形态对气流受限的发生频率的影响。
Sleep. 2021 Dec 10;44(12). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab170.
3
An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: Noninvasive Identification of Inspiratory Flow Limitation in Sleep Studies.
美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告:睡眠研究中吸气气流受限的无创识别
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jul;14(7):1076-1085. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-318WS.
4
Relative prolongation of inspiratory time predicts high versus low resistance categorization of hypopneas.吸气时间相对延长可预测低通气为高阻力或低阻力分类。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Apr 15;8(2):177-85. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1774.