• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间顺序判断标准受同步判断敏感性的影响。

Temporal order judgment criteria are affected by synchrony judgment sensitivity.

作者信息

van Eijk Rob L J, Kohlrausch Armin, Juola James F, van de Par Steven

机构信息

Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2227-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03196697.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196697
PMID:21097865
Abstract

Synchrony perception for audio-visual stimulus pairs is typically studied by using temporal order judgment (TOJ) or synchrony judgment (SJ) tasks. Research has shown that estimates of the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) obtained using these two methods do not necessarily correspond. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that the PSS estimate obtained in a TOJ task is shifted in the direction of the most sensitive part of the synchrony judgment curve, as obtained in an SJ task. The results confirm that criterion shifts in the TOJ task move the PSS toward regions of the audio-visual temporal interval continuum where discriminations are most sensitive.

摘要

对于视听刺激对的同步感知通常通过使用时间顺序判断(TOJ)或同步判断(SJ)任务来进行研究。研究表明,使用这两种方法获得的主观同时性点(PSS)估计值不一定相符。在此,我们研究这样一个假设:在TOJ任务中获得的PSS估计值会朝着在SJ任务中获得的同步判断曲线最敏感部分的方向偏移。结果证实,TOJ任务中的标准偏移会使PSS朝着视听时间间隔连续体中辨别最敏感的区域移动。

相似文献

1
Temporal order judgment criteria are affected by synchrony judgment sensitivity.时间顺序判断标准受同步判断敏感性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2227-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03196697.
2
Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: effects of experimental method and stimulus type.视听同步与时间顺序判断:实验方法和刺激类型的影响
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):955-68. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.6.955.
3
Temporal interval discrimination thresholds depend on perceived synchrony for audio-visual stimulus pairs.视听刺激对的时间间隔辨别阈值取决于感知同步性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1254-63. doi: 10.1037/a0014254.
4
Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.视听时间处理的神经关联——时间顺序与同时性判断的比较
Neuroscience. 2015 Aug 6;300:432-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.时相关同步处理视听刺激的视野差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261129. eCollection 2021.
6
Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.任务相关的视听时间敏感性不受刺激强度水平的影响。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
The consistency of crossmodal synchrony perception across the visual, auditory, and tactile senses.跨视觉、听觉和触觉感官的跨模态同步感知的一致性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jul;42(7):1026-38. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000191. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments.语音的视听时间适应:时间顺序与同时性判断
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1168-9. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
9
A Roving Dual-Presentation Simultaneity-Judgment Task to Estimate the Point of Subjective Simultaneity.一种用于估计主观同时性点的移动双呈现同时性判断任务。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 24;7:416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00416. eCollection 2016.
10
Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.听觉与移动或静止视觉刺激之间同步性的判断。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Dec;61(4):277-92. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007028.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.任务相关的视听时间敏感性不受刺激强度水平的影响。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity.将主观时间顺序的顺序依赖性与主观同时性区分开来。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 9;14(10):e0223184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223184. eCollection 2019.
3
Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.
衰老会损害跨模态的时间敏感性,但不会损害感知同步性。
Multisens Res. 2019 Dec 11;32(8):671-692. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191343.
4
Simultaneity judgment using olfactory-visual, visual-gustatory, and olfactory-gustatory combinations.使用嗅觉-视觉、视觉-味觉和嗅觉-味觉组合进行同步判断。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 4;12(4):e0174958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174958. eCollection 2017.
5
Visual and Auditory Components in the Perception of Asynchronous Audiovisual Speech.异步视听语音感知中的视觉和听觉成分
Iperception. 2015 Nov 30;6(6):2041669515615735. doi: 10.1177/2041669515615735. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Stimulus intensity modulates multisensory temporal processing.刺激强度调节多感官时间处理。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jul 29;88:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Rapid temporal recalibration is unique to audiovisual stimuli.快速时间重新校准是视听刺激所特有的。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jan;233(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4085-8. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
8
On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.在同步判断和时间顺序判断任务中的不一致结果:一种定量模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):820-46. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0278-y.
9
Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception.刺激持续时间对视听同步感知的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Sep;221(4):403-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3182-9. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
10
Response errors explain the failure of independent-channels models of perception of temporal order.反应误差解释了时间顺序感知的独立通道模型的失败。
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 4;3:94. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00094. eCollection 2012.