Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 28.
Flexibility and robustness of multisensory temporal recalibration is paramount for maintaining perceptual constancy of the surrounding natural world. Different environments impart various impediments, distances and routes that alter the propagation times of sight and sound cues comprising a multimodal event. One's ability to rapidly calibrate and account for these external variations allows for maintained perception of synchrony which is crucial for coherent and consistent perception. The two common paradigms used to compare precision of temporal processing between experimental and control groups, the simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks, often use supra-threshold stimuli. However, few studies have specifically examined the effects of normalizing stimulus intensities to participant's unisensory detection thresholds. The current project presented multiple combinations of auditory and visual stimulus intensity levels, based on individual detection thresholds, during a TOJ and a SJ task. While no effect of stimulus intensity was found on temporal sensitivity or perceived temporal synchrony, there was a significant difference in point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) measures between tasks. In addition, PSS estimates were audio-leading, rather than visual-leading as previously reported, suggesting that exposure to the particular combinations of stimulus intensity levels used influenced temporal synchrony perception. Overall, these results support the use of supra-threshold stimuli in TOJ and SJ tasks as a way of minimizing the confound from differences in unisensory processing.
多感觉时间校准的灵活性和鲁棒性对于维持周围自然世界的知觉恒常性至关重要。不同的环境会带来各种障碍、距离和路径,改变包括多模态事件在内的视觉和声音线索的传播时间。一个人快速校准和解释这些外部变化的能力,使得同步知觉得以维持,这对于连贯和一致的知觉至关重要。用于比较实验组和对照组时间处理精度的两个常见范式,即同时性判断(SJ)和时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务,通常使用阈上刺激。然而,很少有研究专门研究将刺激强度归一化为参与者的单感觉检测阈值对时间处理的影响。本项目在 TOJ 和 SJ 任务中,根据个体检测阈值,呈现了听觉和视觉刺激强度水平的多种组合。虽然刺激强度对时间灵敏度或感知时间同步性没有影响,但任务之间的主观同时性(PSS)测量值存在显著差异。此外,PSS 估计值是音频领先,而不是以前报告的视觉领先,这表明暴露于所使用的特定刺激强度水平组合会影响时间同步感知。总的来说,这些结果支持在 TOJ 和 SJ 任务中使用阈上刺激,以最小化单感觉处理差异带来的混淆。