• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.任务相关的视听时间敏感性不受刺激强度水平的影响。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments.语音的视听时间适应:时间顺序与同时性判断
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1168-9. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
3
Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.时相关同步处理视听刺激的视野差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261129. eCollection 2021.
4
Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: effects of experimental method and stimulus type.视听同步与时间顺序判断:实验方法和刺激类型的影响
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):955-68. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.6.955.
5
Behavioral Plasticity of Audiovisual Perception: Rapid Recalibration of Temporal Sensitivity but Not Perceptual Binding Following Adult-Onset Hearing Loss.视听感知的行为可塑性:成人后天性听力损失后时间敏感性的快速重新校准而非知觉绑定
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:256. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
6
Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.视听时间处理的神经关联——时间顺序与同时性判断的比较
Neuroscience. 2015 Aug 6;300:432-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.跨模态对应是否调节模态特定的感知处理?使用定时判断任务的研究。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):273-284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02812-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Motion-Binding Property Contributes to Accurate Temporal-Order Perception in Audiovisual Synchrony.运动绑定属性有助于视听同步中的准确时间顺序感知。
Multisens Res. 2023 Aug 3;36(6):557-572. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10104.
9
On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.在同步判断和时间顺序判断任务中的不一致结果:一种定量模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):820-46. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0278-y.
10
Temporal order judgment criteria are affected by synchrony judgment sensitivity.时间顺序判断标准受同步判断敏感性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2227-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03196697.

本文引用的文献

1
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.JASP 进行和报告贝叶斯分析的指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
2
Rapid recalibration of temporal order judgements: Response bias accounts for contradictory results.快速重新校准时间顺序判断:反应偏差解释了矛盾的结果。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Apr;51(7):1697-1710. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14551. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
The Number of Stimulus-Onset Asynchronies Affects the Perception of the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion in Young and Older Adults.刺激起始异步的数量影响年轻人和老年人对声音诱发闪光错觉的感知。
Multisens Res. 2018 Jan 1;31(3-4):175-190. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002605.
4
Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.衰老会损害跨模态的时间敏感性,但不会损害感知同步性。
Multisens Res. 2019 Dec 11;32(8):671-692. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20191343.
5
Serial dependence in timing perception.时间感知中的序列依赖性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):100-110. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000591.
6
Behavioral Plasticity of Audiovisual Perception: Rapid Recalibration of Temporal Sensitivity but Not Perceptual Binding Following Adult-Onset Hearing Loss.视听感知的行为可塑性:成人后天性听力损失后时间敏感性的快速重新校准而非知觉绑定
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:256. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
7
Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony follows the physical-not the perceived-temporal order.对视听异步的快速重新校准遵循物理而非感知的时间顺序。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):2060-2068. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1540-9.
8
Multisensory integration and ADHD-like traits: Evidence for an abnormal temporal integration window in ADHD.多感官整合与类注意缺陷多动障碍特质:注意缺陷多动障碍中异常时间整合窗口的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Nov;181:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
Spatio-temporal patterns of event-related potentials related to audiovisual synchrony judgments in older adults.老年人视听同步判断相关事件相关电位的时空模式。
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Jul;55:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
10
Atypical rapid audio-visual temporal recalibration in autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍中的非典型快速视听时间重新校准。
Autism Res. 2017 Jan;10(1):121-129. doi: 10.1002/aur.1633. Epub 2016 May 9.

任务相关的视听时间敏感性不受刺激强度水平的影响。

Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.006
PMID:34058622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273142/
Abstract

Flexibility and robustness of multisensory temporal recalibration is paramount for maintaining perceptual constancy of the surrounding natural world. Different environments impart various impediments, distances and routes that alter the propagation times of sight and sound cues comprising a multimodal event. One's ability to rapidly calibrate and account for these external variations allows for maintained perception of synchrony which is crucial for coherent and consistent perception. The two common paradigms used to compare precision of temporal processing between experimental and control groups, the simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks, often use supra-threshold stimuli. However, few studies have specifically examined the effects of normalizing stimulus intensities to participant's unisensory detection thresholds. The current project presented multiple combinations of auditory and visual stimulus intensity levels, based on individual detection thresholds, during a TOJ and a SJ task. While no effect of stimulus intensity was found on temporal sensitivity or perceived temporal synchrony, there was a significant difference in point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) measures between tasks. In addition, PSS estimates were audio-leading, rather than visual-leading as previously reported, suggesting that exposure to the particular combinations of stimulus intensity levels used influenced temporal synchrony perception. Overall, these results support the use of supra-threshold stimuli in TOJ and SJ tasks as a way of minimizing the confound from differences in unisensory processing.

摘要

多感觉时间校准的灵活性和鲁棒性对于维持周围自然世界的知觉恒常性至关重要。不同的环境会带来各种障碍、距离和路径,改变包括多模态事件在内的视觉和声音线索的传播时间。一个人快速校准和解释这些外部变化的能力,使得同步知觉得以维持,这对于连贯和一致的知觉至关重要。用于比较实验组和对照组时间处理精度的两个常见范式,即同时性判断(SJ)和时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务,通常使用阈上刺激。然而,很少有研究专门研究将刺激强度归一化为参与者的单感觉检测阈值对时间处理的影响。本项目在 TOJ 和 SJ 任务中,根据个体检测阈值,呈现了听觉和视觉刺激强度水平的多种组合。虽然刺激强度对时间灵敏度或感知时间同步性没有影响,但任务之间的主观同时性(PSS)测量值存在显著差异。此外,PSS 估计值是音频领先,而不是以前报告的视觉领先,这表明暴露于所使用的特定刺激强度水平组合会影响时间同步感知。总的来说,这些结果支持在 TOJ 和 SJ 任务中使用阈上刺激,以最小化单感觉处理差异带来的混淆。