使用家庭互动宏观编码系统对青少年家庭进行研究：在儿科和健康人群中的心理测量学特性。
Use of the Family Interaction Macro-coding System with families of adolescents: psychometric properties among pediatric and healthy populations.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA.
出版信息
J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Jun;36(5):539-51. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq106. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To examine reliability and validity data for the Family Interaction Macro-coding System (FIMS) with adolescents with spina bifida (SB), adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and healthy adolescents and their families.
METHODS
Sixty-eight families of children with SB, 58 families of adolescents with T1DM, and 68 families in a healthy comparison group completed family interaction tasks and self-report questionnaires. Trained coders rated family interactions using the FIMS.
RESULTS
Acceptable interrater and scale reliabilities were obtained for FIMS items and subscales. Observed FIMS parental acceptance, parental behavioral control, parental psychological control, family cohesion, and family conflict scores demonstrated convergent validity with conceptually similar self-report measures.
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary evidence supports the use of the FIMS with families of youths with SB and T1DM and healthy youths. Future research on overall family functioning may be enhanced by use of the FIMS.
摘要
目的
研究家庭互动宏观编码系统（FIMS）在患有脊柱裂（SB）的青少年、患有 1 型糖尿病（T1DM）的青少年以及健康青少年及其家庭中的可靠性和有效性数据。
方法
68 个 SB 患儿家庭、58 个 T1DM 青少年家庭和 68 个健康对照组家庭完成了家庭互动任务和自我报告问卷。经过培训的编码员使用 FIMS 对家庭互动进行了评分。
结果
FIMS 项目和分量表获得了可接受的评分者间信度和量表信度。观察到的 FIMS 父母接受度、父母行为控制度、父母心理控制度、家庭凝聚力和家庭冲突评分与概念上相似的自我报告测量具有聚合效度。
结论
初步证据支持使用 FIMS 对 SB 和 T1DM 青少年以及健康青少年的家庭进行评估。使用 FIMS 可能会增强对整体家庭功能的研究。
相似文献
1
Use of the Family Interaction Macro-coding System with families of adolescents: psychometric properties among pediatric and healthy populations.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Jun;36(5):539-51. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq106. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
2
Observed and perceived dyadic and systemic functioning in families of preadolescents with spina bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2002 Mar;27(2):177-89. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.2.177.
3
Development of an Observational Parental Scaffolding Measure for Youth with Spina Bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Jul 1;45(6):695-706. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa042.
4
Resilience and Disruption in Observed Family Interactions in Youth With and Without Spina Bifida: An Eight-Year, Five-Wave Longitudinal Study.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Oct;40(9):943-55. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv033. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Family Environment Scale Parental Ratings of Conflict among Latino Families of Depressed Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.
P R Health Sci J. 2018 Dec;37(4):200-207.
6
Individual, family, and peer factors associated with the quality of sibling relationships in families of youths with spina bifida.
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Feb;23(1):39-47. doi: 10.1037/a0014381.
7
Psychometric properties of the Portuguese adaptation of General Functioning of Family Assessment Device: A comparative study.
Fam Syst Health. 2020 Jun;38(2):162-171. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000471. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
A longitudinal study of pubertal timing, parent-child conflict, and cohesion in families of young adolescents with spina bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(5):461-73. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.5.461.
9
Medical adherence in young adolescents with spina bifida: longitudinal associations with family functioning.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Mar;35(2):167-76. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp054. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
10
Discrepancies in mother and child perceptions of spina bifida medical responsibilities during the transition to adolescence: associations with family conflict and medical adherence.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Sep;38(8):859-70. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst047. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Self-management in youth with spina bifida: predictors of health and quality of life outcomes.
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Aug 14:1-18. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2547396.
2
Activating Adolescent and Young Adult Involvement with Cancer Care Responsibilities: A Dyadic Qualitative Study with Caregivers.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024 Aug;13(4):683-692. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0139. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Trajectories of self-management and independence in youth with spina bifida: Family-related predictors of growth.
Res Nurs Health. 2024 Aug;47(4):435-449. doi: 10.1002/nur.22387. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Predictors of Distinct Trajectories of Medical Responsibility in Youth with Spina Bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Nov 1;45(10):1153-1165. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa065.
5
Development of an Observational Parental Scaffolding Measure for Youth with Spina Bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Jul 1;45(6):695-706. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa042.
6
Pathways by which Maternal Factors are Associated With Youth Spina Bifida-Related Responsibility.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Jul 1;45(6):610-621. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa020.
7
Longitudinal associations between neuropsychological functioning and medical responsibility in youth with spina bifida: The moderational role of parenting behaviors.
Child Neuropsychol. 2020 Nov;26(8):1026-1046. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2020.1751098. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
8
Cultural Considerations for Autonomy and Medical Adherence in a Young Palestinian American Muslim Female With Spina Bifida: A Longitudinal Case Study in a Research Context.
Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Dec;6(4):386-397. doi: 10.1037/cpp0000250.
9
Featured Article: Psychosocial and Family Functioning Among Latino Youth With Spina Bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Mar 1;43(2):105-119. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx096.
10
Social Skills in Youth With Spina Bifida: A Longitudinal Multimethod Investigation Comparing Biopsychosocial Predictors.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Nov 1;42(10):1133-1143. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx069.
本文引用的文献
1
Exploring self-management characteristics in youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus: does membership in a glycemic control category matter?
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Dec;11(8):536-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00638.x.
2
A power primer.
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
3
The impact of modifiable family factors on glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Aug;9(4 Pt 2):373-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00370.x.
4
Testing the Biobehavioral Family Model in pediatric asthma: pathways of effect.
Fam Process. 2008 Mar;47(1):21-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00237.x.
5
Editorial: Journal of Pediatric Psychology statement of purpose--section on family influences and adaptation.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):26-30. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm090. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
6
Evidence-based assessment in pediatric psychology: family measures.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Oct;33(9):1046-61; discussion 1062-4. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm083. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
7
Predictors of parenting behavior trajectories among families of young adolescents with and without spina bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(10):1057-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj011. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
8
Decision-making in normal and pathologic families; a study.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1963 Jan;8:68-73. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720070076008.
9
A multimethod, multi-informant, and multidimensional perspective on psychosocial adjustment in preadolescents with spina bifida.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):782-96. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.782.
10
A longitudinal study of pubertal timing, parent-child conflict, and cohesion in families of young adolescents with spina bifida.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(5):461-73. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.5.461.
Zotero 插件