Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Afdeling Neurofysiologie, Departement Neurowetenschappen, K.U. Leuven Medical School, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jul;21(7):1547-58. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq207. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
Recent human functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.) showed that adaptation or repetition suppression is affected by contextual factors related to perceptual expectations, suggesting that adaptation results from a fulfillment of perceptual expectation or a reduction in prediction error. This view contrasts with the bottom-up fatigue or sharpening mechanisms of adaptation proposed in single-cell studies. We examined whether stimulus repetition probability affects adaptation of spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex, using a protocol similar to that of Summerfield et al. Monkeys were exposed to 2 randomly interleaved trials, each consisting of either 2 identical (rep trial) or 2 different stimuli (alt trial). Trials were presented in repetition (rep) blocks consisting of 75% of rep trials and 25% of alt trials or in alternation (alt) blocks having opposite repetition probabilities. For both spiking and LFP activities, the stimulus-selective adaptation did not differ significantly between rep and alt blocks. The number of preceding rep or alt trials and the trial position within a block did not affect adaptation. This absence of any effect of stimulus repetition probability on adaptation suggests that adaptation in IT is not caused by contextual factors related to perceptual expectation.
最近的人类功能磁共振成像研究(Summerfield C、Trittschuh EH、Monti JM、Mesulam MM、Egner T. 2008. 神经重复抑制反映了已满足的感知期望。自然神经科学。11:1004-1006.)表明,适应或重复抑制受到与感知期望相关的上下文因素的影响,这表明适应是由感知期望的满足或预测误差的减少引起的。这种观点与单细胞研究中提出的适应的自上而下的疲劳或锐化机制形成对比。我们检查了刺激重复概率是否会影响猕猴下颞叶(IT)皮层的尖峰活动和局部场电位(LFPs)的适应,使用类似于 Summerfield 等人的方案。猴子暴露于 2 个随机交错的试验中,每个试验由 2 个相同的(重复试验)或 2 个不同的刺激组成(交替试验)。试验在重复(重复)块中呈现,其中包含 75%的重复试验和 25%的交替试验,或在具有相反重复概率的交替(交替)块中呈现。对于尖峰和 LFP 活动,重复和交替块之间的刺激选择性适应没有显著差异。先前重复或交替试验的数量以及块内试验的位置均不影响适应。刺激重复概率对适应没有任何影响,这表明 IT 中的适应不是由与感知期望相关的上下文因素引起的。