• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分视觉输入时间模式处理中的期望和注意效应。

Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.

作者信息

Huizhen Tang Joann, Solomon Selina S, Kohn Adam, Sussman Elyse S

机构信息

Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2024 Dec;182:106228. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106228. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106228
PMID:39461075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11645222/
Abstract

The current study investigated how the brain sets up expectations from stimulus regularities by evaluating the neural responses to expectations driven implicitly (by the stimuli themselves) and explicitly (by task demands). How the brain uses prior information to create expectations and what role attention plays in forming or holding predictions to efficiently respond to incoming sensory information is still debated. We presented temporal patterns of visual input while recording EEG under two different task conditions. When the patterns were task-relevant and pattern recognition was required to perform the button press task, three different event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited, each reflecting a different aspect of pattern expectation. In contrast, when the patterns were task-irrelevant, none of the neural indicators of pattern recognition or pattern violation detection were observed to the same temporally structured sequences. Thus, results revealed a clear distinction between expectation and attention that was prompted by task requirements. These results provide complementary pieces of evidence that implicit exposure to a stimulus pattern may not be sufficient to drive neural effects of expectations that lead to predictive error responses. Task-driven attentional control can dissociate from stimulus-driven expectations, to effectively minimize distracting information and maximize attentional regulation.

摘要

当前的研究通过评估对由刺激本身隐含驱动和由任务要求明确驱动的期望的神经反应,来探究大脑如何根据刺激规律建立期望。大脑如何利用先验信息来创建期望,以及注意力在形成或维持预测以有效响应传入的感官信息中扮演什么角色,仍存在争议。我们在两种不同的任务条件下记录脑电图(EEG)时呈现视觉输入的时间模式。当这些模式与任务相关且执行按钮按下任务需要模式识别时,会引发三种不同的事件相关脑电位(ERP),每种电位反映模式期望的不同方面。相比之下,当这些模式与任务无关时,对于相同的时间结构序列,未观察到模式识别或模式违反检测的神经指标。因此,结果揭示了由任务要求引发的期望和注意力之间的明显区别。这些结果提供了补充证据,表明对刺激模式的隐性暴露可能不足以驱动导致预测误差反应的期望的神经效应。任务驱动的注意力控制可以与刺激驱动的期望分离,以有效减少干扰信息并最大化注意力调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/d68b63c3061d/nihms-2032162-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/29a1da1272f0/nihms-2032162-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/bcc732465e05/nihms-2032162-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/4a100e2392df/nihms-2032162-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/d68b63c3061d/nihms-2032162-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/29a1da1272f0/nihms-2032162-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/bcc732465e05/nihms-2032162-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/4a100e2392df/nihms-2032162-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e13/11645222/d68b63c3061d/nihms-2032162-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.区分视觉输入时间模式处理中的期望和注意效应。
Brain Cogn. 2024 Dec;182:106228. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106228. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.视觉搜索准备过程中目标模板激活过程的时间进程。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
The approach of visual stimuli influences expectations about stimulus types for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.视觉刺激的方式会影响对后续体感刺激的刺激类型的预期。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1563-1571. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5244-0. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.历史调节显著干扰物的早期感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;41(38):8007-8022. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.注意过滤需求对空间线索任务中诱发的准备性事件相关电位的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1087-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 1.
6
Does temporal preparation speed up visual processing? Evidence from the N2pc.时间准备会加快视觉处理速度吗?来自N2pc的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2014 Jun;51(6):529-38. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12196. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.知觉负载影响空间和非空间视觉选择过程:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2071-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
Interaction of top-down category-level expectation and bottom-up sensory input in early stages of visual-orthographic processing.在视觉-正字法加工的早期阶段,自上而下的类别水平期望与自下而上的感觉输入的相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 3;137:107299. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107299. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
9
Temporal uncertainty enhances suppression of neural responses to predictable visual stimuli.时间不确定性增强了对可预测视觉刺激的神经反应的抑制。
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 1;239:118314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118314. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information.期待相关抑制分心信息的神经机制。
Elife. 2020 Dec 15;9:e61048. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61048.

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulus expectations do not modulate visual event-related potentials in probabilistic cueing designs.刺激预期不会调节概率线索设计中的视觉事件相关电位。
Neuroimage. 2023 Oct 15;280:120347. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120347. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Evaluating the evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system.评估视觉系统中期望抑制的证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jul;126:368-381. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans.
有限的证据表明,猕猴和人类的视觉皮层存在感觉预测误差反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 May 10;31(6):3136-3152. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab014.
4
On the control of attentional processes in vision.关于视觉注意力过程的控制。
Cortex. 2021 Apr;137:305-329. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Learning to predict: Neuronal signatures of auditory expectancy in human event-related potentials.学习预测:人类事件相关电位中听觉预期的神经元特征。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 15;225:117472. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117472. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.运用贝叶斯因子假设检验在神经科学中建立无证据的结论。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
The Intricate Interplay of Spatial Attention and Expectation: a Multisensory Perspective.空间注意与期望的复杂相互作用:多感觉视角。
Multisens Res. 2020 Mar 17;33(4-5):383-416. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20201482.
8
A differential role for human hippocampus in novelty and contextual processing: Implications for P300.人类海马体在新颖性和情境处理中的差异作用:对 P300 的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Jul;57(7):e13400. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13400. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Intracranial Recordings and Computational Modeling of Music Reveal the Time Course of Prediction Error Signaling in Frontal and Temporal Cortices.颅内记录和音乐的计算建模揭示了前额叶和颞叶中预测误差信号的时程。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun;31(6):855-873. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01388. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Direct Evidence for Prediction Signals in Frontal Cortex Independent of Prediction Error.前额皮质中独立于预测误差的预测信号的直接证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4530-4538. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy331.