• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习风格偏好与性别、地位和课程表现的比较。

A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance.

机构信息

Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):197-204. doi: 10.1152/advan.00078.2010.

DOI:10.1152/advan.00078.2010
PMID:21098387
Abstract

Students have learning style preferences that are often classified according to their visual (V), aural (A), read-write (R), and/or kinesthetic (K) sensory modality preferences (SMP). The purposes of this investigation were to compare student perceived and assessed SMPs and examine the associations between those SMPs and status (i.e., undergraduates vs. graduates), sex, and course performance. Students from the fall 2009 APK 3110 and APK 6116 Exercise Physiology courses were asked to indicate their perceived SMPs and complete the standard VARK SMP assessment. There were 64 student respondents: 50 undergraduates and 14 graduates (40 women and 24 men). According to the perceived SMP results, the largest number of respondents chose V (36%), followed by R (28%), K (19%), and A (17%). In terms of assessed SMPs, the largest number of respondents were classified as VARK (37%), followed by R (14%), AK (11%), K (8%), VK (6%), ARK (6%), A (5%), VAK (3%), RK (3%), V (2%), AR (2%), and VRK (2%). Nearly two-thirds of the respondents correctly matched their perceived and dominant assessed SMP. There was no statistical association between SMP and status. There was a very nearly significant relationship between sex and both perceived (χ(2) = 7.18, P = 0.06) and assessed (χ(2) = 17.36, P = 0.09) SMP. Finally, there was a significant relationship between perceived SMP and course scores (P = 0.01 by ANOVA). Post hoc tests revealed that the K group scored significantly lower than the other three modality groups.

摘要

学生有学习风格偏好,这些偏好通常根据他们的视觉(V)、听觉(A)、读写(R)和/或动觉(K)感官模式偏好(SMP)进行分类。本研究的目的是比较学生感知和评估的 SMP,并研究这些 SMP 与状态(即本科生与研究生)、性别和课程表现之间的关系。要求 2009 年秋季 APK 3110 和 APK 6116 运动生理学课程的学生表明他们感知的 SMP,并完成标准的 VARK SMP 评估。共有 64 名学生回答了问卷:50 名本科生和 14 名研究生(40 名女性和 24 名男性)。根据感知的 SMP 结果,选择 V 的人数最多(36%),其次是 R(28%)、K(19%)和 A(17%)。就评估的 SMP 而言,选择 VARK 的人数最多(37%),其次是 R(14%)、AK(11%)、K(8%)、VK(6%)、ARK(6%)、A(5%)、VAK(3%)、RK(3%)、V(2%)、AR(2%)和 VRK(2%)。近三分之二的学生正确匹配了他们感知到的和占主导地位的评估 SMP。SMP 与状态之间没有统计学上的关联。性别与感知(χ(2) = 7.18,P = 0.06)和评估(χ(2) = 17.36,P = 0.09)SMP 之间存在非常接近的关系。最后,感知 SMP 与课程成绩之间存在显著关系(ANOVA 检验,P = 0.01)。事后检验显示,K 组的得分明显低于其他三个模式组。

相似文献

1
A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance.学习风格偏好与性别、地位和课程表现的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):197-204. doi: 10.1152/advan.00078.2010.
2
Learning style preferences and course performance in an undergraduate physiology class.大学生理学课程的学习风格偏好与课程表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Dec;33(4):308-14. doi: 10.1152/advan.00048.2009.
3
Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students.本科生理学专业学生学习风格偏好的性别差异。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2007 Jun;31(2):153-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00060.2006.
4
Active physiology learning in a diverse class: an analysis of medical student responses in terms of sex, home language, and self-reported test performance.多元化班级中的主动生理学学习:基于性别、母语和自我报告考试成绩分析医学生的反应。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Jun;36(2):116-24. doi: 10.1152/advan.00132.2010.
5
Learning styles of physiology students interested in the health professions.对健康专业感兴趣的生理学学生的学习风格。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):30-6. doi: 10.1152/advan.90118.2008.
6
Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students?性别会影响一年级医学生的学习风格偏好吗?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2007 Dec;31(4):336-42. doi: 10.1152/advan.00010.2007.
7
Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.研究生入学医学生和本科医学生的学习风格偏好与解剖学评估结果之间的关联。
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Jul 8;9(4):391-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.1600. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
Factors affecting postgraduate dental students' performance in a biostatistics and research design course.影响牙科研究生在生物统计学与研究设计课程中表现的因素。
J Dent Educ. 2009 May;73(5):614-23.
9
Learning styles of postgraduate and undergraduate medical students.研究生和本科生医学生的学习风格。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):25-30.
10
Student learning preferences and teaching implications.学生的学习偏好与教学启示
J Dent Educ. 2004 Aug;68(8):859-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking on your feet: potentially enhancing phylogenetic tree learning accessibility through a kinaesthetic approach.随机应变:通过动觉方法潜在地提高系统发育树学习的可及性。
Evolution (N Y). 2024;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Learning styles and their relationship with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievement among medical students in teaching medical college, Tamil Nadu.泰米尔纳德邦医学院校医学生的学习风格及其与偏好的教学方法和学业成绩的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jul 29;12:256. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_185_23. eCollection 2023.
3
Learning strategies of dental students in Buenos Aires, Argentina prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的牙科学员在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的学习策略。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022 Dec 31;35(3):214-222. doi: 10.54589/aol.35/3/214.
4
Enhancing Toxicology Achievement by the VARK and the GRSLSS-mixed Models in Team-Based Learning.基于 VARK 和 GRSLSS 混合模型的团队学习对毒理学教学效果的提升。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;9:732550. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.732550. eCollection 2021.
5
Examining Learning Styles with Gender Comparison Among Medical Students of a Saudi University.沙特一所大学医学生的性别比较与学习风格研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Mar 31;12:309-318. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S295058. eCollection 2021.
6
The Relationship Between the VARK Learning Styles and Academic Achievement in Dental Students.牙科学生的VARK学习风格与学业成绩之间的关系。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 8;11:15-19. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S235002. eCollection 2020.
7
The influence of learning style in understanding analogies and 2D animations in embryology course.学习风格对胚胎学课程中类比和二维动画理解的影响。
Anat Cell Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):260-265. doi: 10.5115/acb.2018.51.4.260. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
8
Learning style preferences: A study of pre-clinical medical students in Barbados.学习风格偏好:对巴巴多斯临床前医学生的一项研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Oct;5(4):185-194.
9
Relationship between Learning Style and Academic Status of Babol Dental Students.巴博尔牙科专业学生的学习风格与学业成绩之间的关系。
Electron Physician. 2016 May 25;8(5):2340-5. doi: 10.19082/2345. eCollection 2016 May.
10
Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course?学习风格与学习时间及职业选择:哪一项与本科解剖学和生理学综合课程的成绩相关?
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):121-31. doi: 10.1002/ase.1563. Epub 2015 Aug 24.