Laurentino Telma G, Scheller Meike, Glover Gillian, Proulx Michael J, de Sousa Alexandra A
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA.
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Evolution (N Y). 2024;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
Phylogenetics is one of the main methodologies to understand cross-cutting principles of evolution, such as common ancestry and speciation. Phylogenetic trees, however, are reportedly challenging to teach and learn. Furthermore, phylogenetics teaching methods traditionally rely solely on visual information, creating inaccessibility for people with visual impairment. Sensory learning style models advocate for tailoring teaching to individual preferred sensory learning style. However, recent research suggests that optimal learning, independently of preferred learning style, depends on the types of transmitted information and learning tasks. The lack of empirically-supported education into the effectiveness of teaching phylogenetics through alternative sensory modalities potentially hinders learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether phylogenetic trees could be better understood if presented in kinaesthetic or multisensory teaching modalities.
Participants ( = 52) self-assessed personal learning style and were randomly assigned to: visual, kinaesthetic or multisensory learning conditions. Phylogeny reading performance was better for both kinaesthetic and multisensory teaching conditions, compared to the visual teaching condition. There was no main effect and no interaction effect of personal learning style.
This study establishes a baseline for further research by suggesting that easy-to-implement kinaesthetic teaching modalities might support phylogenetic tree learning and reading. This has practical implications for evolution education and accessibility for students with visual impairment, underscoring the need to shift from vision-centric teaching paradigms towards evidence-based instructional strategies that accommodate sensory diversity.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y.
系统发育学是理解进化的交叉原则(如共同祖先和物种形成)的主要方法之一。然而,据报道,系统发育树的教学具有挑战性。此外,系统发育学的教学方法传统上仅依赖视觉信息,这使得视障人士难以获取相关内容。感官学习风格模型主张根据个人偏好的感官学习风格调整教学。然而,最近的研究表明,无论偏好的学习风格如何,最佳学习取决于所传递信息的类型和学习任务。缺乏关于通过替代感官模式教授系统发育学有效性的实证支持的教育可能会阻碍学习。本研究的目的是确定以动觉或多感官教学模式呈现系统发育树时,是否能更好地被理解。
参与者(n = 52)自我评估个人学习风格,并被随机分配到:视觉、动觉或多感官学习条件。与视觉教学条件相比,动觉和多感官教学条件下的系统发育阅读表现更好。个人学习风格没有主效应和交互效应。
本研究通过表明易于实施的动觉教学模式可能支持系统发育树的学习和阅读,为进一步研究奠定了基础。这对进化教育和视障学生的可及性具有实际意义,强调了从以视觉为中心的教学范式转向适应感官多样性的循证教学策略的必要性。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12052-024-00215-y获取的补充材料。