National Resource Centre for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 23 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Mar;50(3):598-602. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq345. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
To assess beneficial and harmful effects of arthroplasty in the shoulder joint in patients with RA.
A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials and case series (included for assessment of complications) published between 1995 and 2008. Articles considered potentially relevant were retrieved in full text and assessed independently by two authors. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed according to the established criteria.
One RCT (26 shoulders) compared cemented and uncemented humeral stem fixation during arthroplasty, reporting no significant differences between groups at 2-year follow-up (low-quality evidence). Nineteen case series (1155 shoulders) reported component loosening requiring revision at 5%, infections at 2% and minor complications at 7% (very low-quality evidence). The retrospective case series had several limitations related to methodological quality and standards of reporting.
At present, there is very little research evidence supporting decisions about shoulder joint arthroplasty in patients with RA.
评估在类风湿关节炎患者中进行肩关节置换术的获益和危害。
在 Cochrane 协作组织的框架内进行系统评价,确定了 1995 年至 2008 年间发表的随机对照试验(RCT)、对照临床试验和病例系列(包括并发症评估)。检索到被认为可能相关的文章,并由两位作者独立进行全文评估。根据既定标准评估偏倚风险和证据水平。
一项 RCT(26 例肩)比较了关节置换术中骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定肱骨干,在 2 年随访时两组之间无显著差异(低质量证据)。19 项病例系列研究(1155 例肩)报告了 5%需要翻修的组件松动、2%的感染和 7%的轻微并发症(极低质量证据)。回顾性病例系列研究在方法学质量和报告标准方面存在一些局限性。
目前,关于类风湿关节炎患者肩关节置换术的决策依据的研究证据非常有限。