• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥预后评分是预测不可切除胰腺癌患者治疗结局的良好指标。

The Glasgow Prognostic Score is a good predictor of treatment outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 2010;56(6):501-6. doi: 10.1159/000321014. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1159/000321014
PMID:21099223
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the outcome of patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer treated in our department from 2001 to 2008.

METHODS

Of the 83 patients included in this study, 50 patients received single-agent treatment with gemcitabine (GEM), 9 patients GEM combined with radiotherapy (GEM+R) and 24 patients had best supportive care (BSC). We analyzed survival rates among the groups and risk factors for each group.

RESULTS

The 3-year survival rates were dismal: GEM group 2.9%, GEM+R group 0% and BSC group 0%. Significant prognostic factors of the study were: performance status (PS), response rate and decrease in the CA19-9 level. Significant prognostic factors by the Cox proportional hazard model were the albumin level prior to treatment, CA19-9 levels before treatment, decrease in CA19-9 and response rate. Albumin levels and the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) were found to be factors affecting survival in the GEM group.

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, good PS, decrease in CA19-9 after treatment and good GPS determined prior to treatment were independent prognostic factors for better overall survival.

摘要

背景

我们分析了 2001 年至 2008 年在我科治疗的晚期不可切除胰腺癌患者的预后。

方法

本研究共纳入 83 例患者,其中 50 例接受单药吉西他滨(GEM)治疗,9 例接受 GEM 联合放疗(GEM+R),24 例接受最佳支持治疗(BSC)。我们分析了各组的生存率和各组的危险因素。

结果

3 年生存率很低:GEM 组为 2.9%,GEM+R 组为 0%,BSC 组为 0%。该研究的显著预后因素为:体能状态(PS)、缓解率和 CA19-9 水平降低。Cox 比例风险模型的显著预后因素为治疗前白蛋白水平、治疗前 CA19-9 水平、CA19-9 降低和缓解率。白蛋白水平和格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)被发现是 GEM 组生存的影响因素。

结论

在这一系列不可切除的胰腺癌患者中,良好的 PS、治疗后 CA19-9 降低和治疗前良好的 GPS 是总体生存的独立预后因素。

相似文献

1
The Glasgow Prognostic Score is a good predictor of treatment outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.格拉斯哥预后评分是预测不可切除胰腺癌患者治疗结局的良好指标。
Chemotherapy. 2010;56(6):501-6. doi: 10.1159/000321014. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
2
Efficacy and safety of metallic stents in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine.金属支架在接受吉西他滨治疗的不可切除胰腺癌患者中的疗效与安全性。
Pancreas. 2008 Nov;37(4):405-10. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181706d93.
3
Gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.吉西他滨作为不可切除胰腺癌老年患者的一线化疗药物。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0258-9. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
4
Effect of low-dose gemcitabine on unresectable pancreatic cancer in elderly patients.低剂量吉西他滨治疗老年不可切除胰腺癌的疗效。
Digestion. 2011;84(3):230-5. doi: 10.1159/000330384. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
5
Serum CA19-9 alterations during preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy for resectable invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas as an indicator for therapeutic selection and survival.血清 CA19-9 在可切除的胰腺浸润性导管癌术前基于吉西他滨的放化疗中的变化,作为治疗选择和生存的指标。
Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):461-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc90a3.
6
Practical prognostic index for survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine or S-1.吉西他滨或S-1治疗不可切除胰腺癌患者生存的实用预后指数
Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Mar-Apr;62(138):478-84.
7
Combining the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level Improves the Ability to Predict Early Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Gemcitabine.
Anticancer Res. 2016 May;36(5):2467-74.
8
Gemcitabine chemotherapy versus 5-fluorouracil-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨化疗与基于5-氟尿嘧啶的同步放化疗治疗局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌的对比研究
Pancreas. 2006 Nov;33(4):397-402. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000236725.26672.be.
9
Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia.吉西他滨与S-1联合化疗对比单纯吉西他滨治疗局部晚期和转移性胰腺癌:一项亚洲随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Chemother. 2015 Aug;27(4):227-34. doi: 10.1179/1973947815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial.吉西他滨单药治疗与吉西他滨联合放疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌患者的疗效比较:一项东部肿瘤协作组的临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4105-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.8904. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Systemic Inflammation and Clinicopathologic Features on Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Multicenter Analysis.全身炎症和临床病理特征对恶性胸膜间皮瘤生存的影响:一项多中心分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 16;61(1):144. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010144.
2
Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG), a digital health intervention to reduce malnutrition among pancreatic cancer patients: A study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.通过远程观察和营养指导提供支持(STRONG),一项旨在减少胰腺癌患者营养不良的数字健康干预措施:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 23;38:101271. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101271. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Relation to CA-125 and CA 19-9 Expression.
CA-125 和 CA19-9 表达与弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的临床病理特征及预后的关系。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:2515690X231198315. doi: 10.1177/2515690X231198315.
4
The Role of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Pancreatectomy: a Norwegian Nationwide Cohort Study.术前炎症标志物在胰腺切除术:一项挪威全国队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug;27(8):1650-1659. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05726-5. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
The application of the Glasgow prognostic score to predict the survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.应用格拉斯哥预后评分预测转移性胰腺癌患者的生存率。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):406-412. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_81_2021. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
6
Effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗老年晚期胰腺癌患者的有效性和安全性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Invest New Drugs. 2022 Oct;40(5):1106-1116. doi: 10.1007/s10637-022-01221-x. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
Usefulness of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in Patients with Surgically Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.基于炎症的预后评分在接受手术治疗的胰腺导管腺癌患者中的应用价值
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 10;10(24):5784. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245784.
8
Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.纪念斯隆凯特琳预后评分在转移性胰腺腺癌中的预后价值。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1568-1575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33420. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Pancreas Cancer-Associated Weight Loss.胰腺癌相关体重减轻。
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):691-701. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0266. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.一线纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨治疗转移性或复发性胰腺癌患者的预后因素:炎症相关评分的意义。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Jun;37(3):584-590. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0681-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.