• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨治疗转移性或复发性胰腺癌患者的预后因素:炎症相关评分的意义。

Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Invest New Drugs. 2019 Jun;37(3):584-590. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0681-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10637-018-0681-y
PMID:30324344
Abstract

Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) is standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, prognostic factors for patients with mPC treated with AG, are largely unknown. We retrospectively identified prognostic factors, including inflammation-based prognostic scores, in patients with mPC, and recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with AG as first-line treatment. Method A total of 203 patients with histologically-confirmed recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with first-line AG in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between February 2016 and December 2016 were included in this analysis. As inflammation-based scores, baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic scores (mGPS) were tested. Result Median age was 62 years and 116 patients (57%) were male. With median follow-up duration of 21.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 (95% CI 6.2-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 15.1 (95% CI 12.6-17.6) months. In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly associated with liver metastasis (HR 1.43), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.48), and elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.56). In multivariate analysis for OS, elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.75), liver metastasis (HR 1.76), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.41), and high mGPS (mGPS ≥1 vs.0: HR 1.64) were independent prognostic factors. NLR and PLR were not significantly associated with PFS and OS. Conclusion Among the inflammation based prognostic scores, mGPS was a reliable prognostic indicator that could stratify survival outcomes in patients with recurrent or mPC who received AG as first-line chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨(AG)是转移性胰腺癌(mPC)患者的标准一线化疗方案。然而,接受 AG 治疗的 mPC 患者的预后因素在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们回顾性地确定了包括炎症相关预后评分在内的预后因素,这些因素存在于接受 AG 作为一线治疗的 mPC 和复发性胰腺癌患者中。

方法

本研究共纳入 203 例在韩国首尔 Asan 医疗中心接受一线 AG 治疗的组织学证实复发性或转移性胰腺癌患者。这些患者于 2016 年 2 月至 2016 年 12 月接受治疗。作为炎症相关评分,基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)被进行了检测。

结果

中位年龄为 62 岁,116 例(57%)为男性。中位随访时间为 21.5 个月,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 7.1(95%CI 6.2-7.9)个月,总生存期(OS)为 15.1(95%CI 12.6-17.6)个月。多变量分析显示,PFS 与肝转移(HR 1.43)、远处淋巴结转移(HR 1.48)和 CA19-9 升高(HR 1.56)显著相关。在 OS 的多变量分析中,CA19-9 升高(HR 1.75)、肝转移(HR 1.76)、远处淋巴结转移(HR 1.41)和高 mGPS(mGPS≥1 比 0:HR 1.64)是独立的预后因素。NLR 和 PLR 与 PFS 和 OS 无显著相关性。

结论

在炎症相关预后评分中,mGPS 是一个可靠的预后指标,可对接受 AG 作为一线化疗的复发性或 mPC 患者的生存结果进行分层。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.一线纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨治疗转移性或复发性胰腺癌患者的预后因素:炎症相关评分的意义。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Jun;37(3):584-590. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0681-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
2
nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌:III 期临床试验的长期生存结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 31;107(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju413. Print 2015 Feb.
3
Prognostic analysis and outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as second or later-line treatment.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗晚期不可切除肝癌的中国真实世界研究
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(12):e7345. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7345.
4
Prognostic factors for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in real-life practice: the ANICE-PaC study.在真实实践中,使用 nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌的生存预后因素:ANICE-PaC 研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5101-3.
5
Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.比较 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌:使用韩国胰腺癌(K-PaC)登记处。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):654-659. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000730.
6
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: retrospective analysis.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨对比 FOLFIRINOX 作为转移性胰腺癌一线化疗方案的回顾性分析。
Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug;36(4):732-741. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0598-5. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy after Progression on Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨二线化疗治疗转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者进展后的临床结局。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):254-262. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.190. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.转移性胰腺癌中,吉西他滨+白蛋白紫杉醇治疗后采用改良 FOLFIRINOX 作为二线治疗。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 20;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06945-8.
9
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: a retrospective cohort study.吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌患者化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症作为预后因素的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;86(2):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04110-3. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.一项针对转移性胰腺癌患者的随机III期试验(MPACT)中,每周使用纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨与单独使用吉西他滨相比的生存预后因素。
Oncologist. 2015 Feb;20(2):143-50. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0394. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Prognostic Factors in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: State of the Art and Prospects.可切除胰腺癌的术前预后因素:现状与展望
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4117-4127. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17062-w. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel versus Gemcitabine Alone in Older Adults with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.比较吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇与吉西他滨单药治疗不可切除的老年胰腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。
Oncologist. 2022 Oct 1;27(10):e774-e782. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac157.
3
Real-world prognostic factors for survival among treated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes with First-Line Chemotherapy in a Large Retrospective Study of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a US Community Oncology Setting.美国社区肿瘤治疗环境中转移性胰腺癌患者大型回顾性研究中一线化疗的临床结果
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018 Sep;5(3):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s40801-018-0137-x.
2
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: retrospective analysis.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨对比 FOLFIRINOX 作为转移性胰腺癌一线化疗方案的回顾性分析。
Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug;36(4):732-741. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0598-5. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
转移性胰腺导管腺癌治疗患者生存的真实世界预后因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(24):8934-8943. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4415. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as prognostic markers for advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及糖类抗原19-9作为晚期胰腺癌一线化疗患者的预后标志物
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):915-928. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i8.915.
5
Prognostic value of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Prognostic Score in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.纪念斯隆凯特琳预后评分在转移性胰腺腺癌中的预后价值。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1568-1575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33420. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.改良格拉斯哥预后评分对胰腺癌的预后及临床意义:4629 例患者的荟萃分析。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Jan 6;13(1):1410-1421. doi: 10.18632/aging.202357.
7
The prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.改良格拉斯哥预后评分在胰腺癌中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Sep 22;20:462. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01558-4. eCollection 2020.
8
Prognostic Significance of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.改良格拉斯哥预后评分在胰腺癌患者中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析
Dose Response. 2020 Aug 3;18(3):1559325820942065. doi: 10.1177/1559325820942065. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
9
Prognostic and predictive factors in pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的预后因素和预测因素。
Oncotarget. 2020 Mar 10;11(10):924-941. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27518.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Second-Line Chemotherapy after Progression on Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.纳武利尤单抗联合吉西他滨二线化疗治疗转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者进展后的临床结局。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):254-262. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.190. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2015.
韩国癌症统计数据:2015 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和流行率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;50(2):303-316. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.143. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Prognostic Implication of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with First-line Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin.基于炎症的预后评分对吉西他滨联合顺铂一线治疗肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的影响
Invest New Drugs. 2018 Jun;36(3):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0548-7. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Clinical Implication of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Pancreatic Cancer: Glasgow Prognostic Score Is the Most Reliable Parameter.基于炎症的预后评分在胰腺癌中的临床意义:格拉斯哥预后评分是最可靠的参数。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3582. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003582.
7
Prognostic Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Who Were Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy.复发性或转移性胰腺腺癌患者接受基于吉西他滨化疗的风险分层的预后因素。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;48(4):1264-1273. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.250. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
C-Reactive Protein Level Is an Indicator of the Aggressiveness of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.C反应蛋白水平是晚期胰腺癌侵袭性的一个指标。
Pancreas. 2016 Jan;45(1):110-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000465.
9
Prognostication by inflammation-based score in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.基于炎症评分对接受放化疗的局部晚期胰腺癌患者进行预后评估。
Pancreatology. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Evaluation of Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.胰腺癌改良格拉斯哥预后评分的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pancreas. 2016 Feb;45(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000446.