Popkov Dmitry, Popkov Arnold, Haumont Thierry, Journeau Pierre, Lascombes Pierre
CHU Brabois, Hôpital d'Enfants, Chirurgie Infantile Orthopédique, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Dec;30(8):910-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f0eaf9.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of the external fixation associated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) on the healing index (HI) in limb lengthening.
We compared the healing index between 2 groups of children undergone the lengthening of upper and lower limbs carried out with the Ilizarov external fixator alone (group I, 194 cases of lengthening) or with the combination of the Ilizarov external fixator and intramedullary nailing (group II, 92 cases). Two nails of the diameter from 1.5 to 2.0 mm with the ray of curvature about 40 degrees to 50 degrees were used for the intramedullary nailing.
The HI was less in every subgroup of Group II compared with Group I. A significant difference was noted in congenital pathologies: monofocal monosegmental lengthening at the level of femur and forearm, bifocal lengthening of the tibia, polysegmental lengthening; and in acquired discrepancy: monofocal tibial lengthening, bifocal femoral lengthening, and the forearm lengthening. The reduction of HI was between 60% and 85% in congenital pathologies: monosegmental femur and forearm, bifocal femur and tibia lengthening; and in acquired discrepancy: femur, tibia, humerus and forearm monosegmental lengthening, humerus and tibia bifocal lengthening, and polysegmental in upper and lower limbs. This difference varies from 1.9 days/cm to 19.1 days/cm. That means that the duration of the external fixator was decreased of 20% to 33% of the number of days between the Group I and the Group II. Maximum diminution of HI was noted for monofocal acquired forearm cases (51.3%) and bifocal acquired femoral lengthening cases which (59.9%).
The flexible intramedullary nailing allows adding multiple advantages to the method of limb lengthening with the external fixator. Correctly applied the FIN indeed respects the bone biology that is essential during the limb lengthening. The major effect of application of the combination of Ilizarov frame fixation with FIN is a significant decrease of duration of the external osteosynthesis.
II.
本研究旨在评估外固定联合弹性髓内钉(FIN)对肢体延长愈合指数(HI)的影响。
我们比较了两组接受上下肢延长手术患儿的愈合指数,一组仅采用伊里扎洛夫外固定器(I组,194例延长病例),另一组采用伊里扎洛夫外固定器与髓内钉联合使用(II组,92例)。髓内钉采用两根直径为1.5至2.0毫米、曲率半径约为40度至50度的钉子。
与I组相比,II组的每个亚组的HI均较低。在先天性疾病中:股骨和前臂单焦点单节段延长、胫骨双焦点延长、多节段延长;以及后天性畸形中:单焦点胫骨延长、双焦点股骨延长和前臂延长方面存在显著差异。在先天性疾病中:单节段股骨和前臂、双焦点股骨和胫骨延长;以及后天性畸形中:股骨、胫骨、肱骨和前臂单节段延长、肱骨和胫骨双焦点延长以及上下肢多节段延长,HI的降低幅度在60%至85%之间。这种差异从1.9天/厘米到19.1天/厘米不等。这意味着外固定器的使用时间在I组和II组之间减少了20%至33%。单焦点后天性前臂病例(51.3%)和双焦点后天性股骨延长病例(59.9%)的HI降低幅度最大。
弹性髓内钉可为外固定肢体延长方法增添多种优势。正确应用FIN确实尊重了肢体延长过程中至关重要的骨生物学特性。伊里扎洛夫框架固定与FIN联合应用的主要效果是显著缩短了外固定的时间。
II级。