• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组合机制在屈折词的产生中何时适用?

When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words?

机构信息

a Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010;27(4):334-59. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1080/02643294.2010.524467
PMID:21104479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3117036/
Abstract

A central question for theories of inflected word processing is to determine under what circumstances compositional procedures apply. Some accounts (e.g., the dual-mechanism model; Clahsen, 1999 ) propose that compositional processes only apply to verbs that take productive affixes. For all other verbs, inflected forms are assumed to be stored in the lexicon in a nondecomposed manner. This account makes clear predictions about the consequences of disruption to the lexical access mechanisms involved in the spoken production of inflected forms. Briefly, it predicts that nonproductive forms (which require lexical access) should be more affected than productive forms (which, depending on the language task, may not). We tested these predictions through the detailed analysis of the spoken production of a German-speaking individual with an acquired lexical impairment resulting from a stroke. Analyses of response accuracy, error types, and frequency effects revealed that combinatorial processes are not restricted to verbs that take productive inflections. On this basis, we propose an alternative account, the stem-based assembly model (SAM), which posits that combinatorial processes may be available to all stems and not only to those that combine with productive affixes.

摘要

对于曲折词加工理论来说,一个核心问题是确定在什么情况下会运用组合过程。一些理论(如双机制模型;Clahsen,1999)认为,组合过程仅适用于带有能产性词缀的动词。对于所有其他动词,其曲折形式都被认为是以非分解的方式存储在词汇中的。这个理论对与曲折形式的口语产生有关的词汇通达机制受到干扰的后果做出了明确的预测。简单来说,它预测非能产性形式(需要词汇通达)应该比能产性形式(根据语言任务的不同,可能不需要)受到更大的影响。我们通过对一位因中风而导致获得性词汇损伤的德语使用者的口语产生进行详细分析来检验这些预测。对反应准确性、错误类型和频率效应的分析表明,组合过程并不仅限于带有能产性曲折的动词。在此基础上,我们提出了一个替代理论,即基于词干的组合模型(SAM),该理论假设组合过程可能适用于所有词干,而不仅仅是那些与能产性词缀组合的词干。

相似文献

1
When do combinatorial mechanisms apply in the production of inflected words?组合机制在屈折词的产生中何时适用?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010;27(4):334-59. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.524467. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
2
The impact of morphophonological patterns on verb production: evidence from acquired morphological impairment.形态音位模式对动词产出的影响:来自后天形态损伤的证据。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(1-2):68-94. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1519727. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Asymmetric inhibitory treatment effects in multilingual aphasia.多语失语症中的非对称抑制治疗效果。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):564-77. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.878692. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
4
The processing of inflected words.
Psychol Res. 1991;53(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00867329.
5
The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.词汇与语法的陈述性/程序性模型
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):37-69. doi: 10.1023/a:1005204207369.
6
On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: evidence from neuropsychology.
Cognition. 2003 Mar;87(2):101-27. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00200-7.
7
What's in a sentence? The crucial role of lexical content in sentence production in nonfluent aphasia.句子中有什么?词汇内容在非流畅性失语症句子产生中的关键作用。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):507-43. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.876398. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
Semantic, lexical, and phonological influences on the production of verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia.语义、词汇和语音对语法缺失性失语症中动词词形变化产生的影响。
Brain Lang. 2004 Jun;89(3):484-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.006.
9
Inflected words in production: Evidence for a morphologically rich lexicon.产出中的屈折词:形态丰富的词汇的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):432-54. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1054847. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
10
How are inflectional affixes organized in the mental lexicon?: evidence from the investigation of agreement errors in agrammatic aphasics.屈折词缀在心理词典中是如何组织的?:来自对语法缺失性失语症患者一致错误调查的证据。
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):180-91. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2516.

引用本文的文献

1
Plural dominance and the production of determiner-noun phrases in French.复数优势与法语中限定词-名词短语的生成。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0200723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200723. eCollection 2018.
2
The interface between morphology and phonology: exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production.形态学与音系学的界面:探索口语产生中的形态音系缺陷。
Cognition. 2013 May;127(2):270-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system.性别从何而来?来自一个复杂屈折系统的证据。
Lang Cogn Process. 2005;20(1-2):139-167. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000205.
2
A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System.语言中的神经分离:心理词典属于陈述性记忆,语法规则由程序性系统加工的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):266-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.266.
3
Rules, representations, and the English past tense.规则、表述与英语过去时
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Nov 1;2(11):428-35. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01239-x.
4
Consistency and regularity in past-tense verb generation in healthy ageing, Alzheimer's disease, and semantic dementia.健康老化、阿尔茨海默病和语义性痴呆过去时动词生成的一致性和规律性。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Sep;23(6):856-76. doi: 10.1080/02643290500483124.
5
Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?词的构成能仅通过语义来理解吗? (注:原句中“understanded”使用错误,正确形式应为“understood” )
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Feb;56(1):30-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 May 10.
6
Broca's area and inflectional morphology: evidence from broca's aphasia and computer modeling.布洛卡区与屈折形态学:来自布洛卡失语症及计算机建模的证据
Cortex. 2006 May;42(4):563-76. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70395-2.
7
The role of meaning in past-tense inflection: evidence from polysemy and denominal derivation.意义在过去式屈折变化中的作用:来自一词多义及名词派生的证据。
Cognition. 2007 Jul;104(1):150-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 12.
8
Facts, events, and inflection: when language and memory dissociate.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1074-86. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475163.
9
Regular and irregular morphology and its relationship with agrammatism: evidence from two Spanish-Catalan bilinguals.
Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.007.
10
On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: evidence from neuropsychology.
Cognition. 2003 Mar;87(2):101-27. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00200-7.