Department of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Deonar, Mumbai, India.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Sep;26(5):429-40. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq075. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
The concentration index is the most commonly used measure of socio-economic-related health inequality. However, a critical constraint has been that it is just a measure of inequality. Equity is an important goal of health policy but the average level of health also matters. In this paper, we explore evidence of both these crucial dimensions-equity (inequality) and efficiency (average health)-in child health indicators by adopting the recently developed measure of the extended concentration index on the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) data from India. An increasing degree of inequality aversion is used to measure health inequalities as well as achievement in the following child health indicators: under-2 child mortality, full immunization coverage, and prevalence of underweight, wasting and stunting among children. State-wise adjusted under-2 child mortality scores reveal an increasing trend with increasing values of inequality aversion, implying that under-2 child deaths have been significantly concentrated among the poor households. The level of adjusted under-2 child mortality scores increases significantly with the increasing value of aversion even in states advanced in the health transition, such as Kerala and Goa. The higher values of adjusted scores for lower values of aversion for child immunization coverage are evidence that richer households benefited most from the rise in full immunization coverage. However, the lack of radical changes in the adjusted scores for underweight among children with increasing degrees of aversion implies that household economic status was not the only determinant of poor nutritional status in India.
集中指数是衡量与社会经济相关的健康不平等最常用的指标。然而,一个关键的限制是它只是衡量不平等的一个指标。公平是卫生政策的一个重要目标,但平均健康水平也很重要。在本文中,我们通过采用最近在印度国家家庭健康调查(NFHS-3)数据上开发的扩展集中指数的测量方法,探讨了儿童健康指标中的这两个关键维度——公平(不平等)和效率(平均健康)的证据。我们使用不断增加的不平等厌恶程度来衡量以下儿童健康指标的健康不平等和成就:2 岁以下儿童死亡率、完全免疫覆盖率以及儿童体重不足、消瘦和发育迟缓的流行率。各州调整后的 2 岁以下儿童死亡率评分显示,随着不平等厌恶程度的增加呈上升趋势,这意味着 2 岁以下儿童的死亡明显集中在贫困家庭中。即使在像喀拉拉邦和果阿邦这样已经进入健康转型阶段的州,调整后的 2 岁以下儿童死亡率评分随着厌恶程度的增加而显著增加。对于儿童免疫覆盖率,较低的调整评分和较高的厌恶值表明,较富裕的家庭从完全免疫覆盖率的提高中获益最多。然而,随着不平等程度的增加,儿童消瘦的调整评分缺乏明显变化,这意味着家庭经济状况并不是印度儿童营养不良的唯一决定因素。