Schiller J H, Storer B, Bittner G, Horisberger M A
William S. Middleton Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, WI 53705.
J Interferon Res. 1990 Apr;10(2):129-39. doi: 10.1089/jir.1990.10.129.
We employed a tumor-type-specific tissue culture model utilizing three human colon carcinoma cell lines to (i) assess the effects of schedule, sequence, dose, and duration of exposure on the antiproliferative activity of combinations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and to (ii) determine the effects of this combination on the production of a TNF-inducible protein, IFN-beta 2, and an IFN-inducible protein, p78. A statistical model was developed to ascertain the effects of each of three of the variables (sequence, dose, and duration) on the other two. With minor exceptions, the maximal antiproliferative effect in all three cell lines was observed when IFN-gamma and TNF were administered simultaneously, regardless of the doses of each agent and duration of exposure. Exposing the cells to TNF before IFN-gamma resulted in the least inhibition in cell growth. In all three cell lines, the antiproliferative effects of each treatment group were related directly to the duration of exposure. In two of the three cell lines, an intermittent schedule was as effective as a 24-h exposure. No p78 induction was observed in the HCT 116 cell line with IFN-gamma alone, TNF alone, or the combination; p78 was slightly induced in the SKC01 and VACO 9P cell lines with IFN-gamma alone, and was synergistically induced by the combination of TNF and IFN-gamma. Treatment with a neutralizing antibody to IFN-beta did not reverse the antiproliferative effect of any of the three treatment groups in HCT 116 cells. We conclude that the maximum antiproliferative effect in human colon carcinoma can be achieved by the prolonged simultaneous administration of high concentrations of each drug. If clinical toxicity prohibits this schedule, an intermittent schedule of administration may be effective. The mechanism of the synergistic effect is not due to the induction of IFN-beta or the p78 protein.
我们采用了一种肿瘤类型特异性组织培养模型,利用三种人结肠癌细胞系来:(i)评估给药方案、顺序、剂量和暴露持续时间对肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)联合使用时抗增殖活性的影响;以及(ii)确定这种联合用药对一种TNF诱导蛋白IFN-β2和一种IFN诱导蛋白p78产生的影响。开发了一个统计模型来确定三个变量(顺序、剂量和持续时间)中的每一个对另外两个变量的影响。除了一些小的例外情况,在所有三种细胞系中,当IFN-γ和TNF同时给药时,无论每种药物的剂量和暴露持续时间如何,都观察到了最大的抗增殖作用。在IFN-γ之前先让细胞接触TNF,对细胞生长的抑制作用最小。在所有三种细胞系中,每个治疗组的抗增殖作用都与暴露持续时间直接相关。在三种细胞系中的两种中,间歇性给药方案与24小时暴露一样有效。在HCT 116细胞系中,单独使用IFN-γ、单独使用TNF或联合使用时均未观察到p78的诱导;单独使用IFN-γ时,SKC01和VACO 9P细胞系中p78有轻微诱导,而TNF和IFN-γ联合使用时则协同诱导p78。用抗IFN-β中和抗体处理并未逆转HCT 116细胞中三个治疗组中任何一组的抗增殖作用。我们得出结论,通过长时间同时给予高浓度的每种药物,可以在人结肠癌中实现最大的抗增殖作用。如果临床毒性不允许这种给药方案,间歇性给药方案可能有效。协同作用的机制不是由于IFN-β或p