HealthNet TPO, Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Global Health Initiative, Yale University, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):818-28. doi: 10.1037/a0021348.
The authors examined moderators and mediators of a school-based psychosocial intervention for children affected by political violence, according to an ecological resilience theoretical framework.
The authors examined data from a cluster randomized trial, involving children aged 8-13 in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia (treatment condition n = 182, waitlist control condition n = 221). Mediators (hope, coping, peer/emotional/play social support) and moderators (gender, age, family connectedness, household size, other forms of social support, exposure to political violence, and displacement) of treatment outcome on posttraumatic stress symptoms and function impairment were examined in parallel process latent growth curve models.
Compared with the waitlist group, those receiving treatment showed maintained hope, increased positive coping, maintained peer social support, and increased play social support. Of these putative mediators, only play social support was found to mediate treatment effects, such that increases in play social support were associated with smaller reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Furthermore, the authors identified a number of moderators: Girls showed larger treatment benefits on PTSD symptoms; girls, children in smaller households, and children receiving social support from adults outside the household showed larger treatment benefits on function impairment.
Findings provide limited evidence for an ecological resilience theoretical framework. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a stronger separation between universal prevention (e.g., resilience promotion through play) and selective/indicated prevention (e.g., interventions aimed at decreasing posttraumatic stress symptoms). Play-based interventions should be careful to exclude children with psychological distress. In addition, treatment effects may be augmented by selecting girls and socially vulnerable children.
作者根据生态弹性理论框架,研究了针对受政治暴力影响儿童的学校心理社会干预的调节因素和中介因素。
作者对印度尼西亚中苏拉威西的一项群组随机试验的数据进行了分析,该试验涉及 8-13 岁的儿童(治疗组 n = 182,候补对照组 n = 221)。在平行过程潜在增长曲线模型中,平行检验了治疗对创伤后应激症状和功能障碍的结果的中介因素(希望、应对、同伴/情感/游戏社会支持)和调节因素(性别、年龄、家庭联系、家庭规模、其他形式的社会支持、政治暴力暴露和流离失所)。
与候补对照组相比,接受治疗的儿童表现出希望维持、积极应对增加、同伴社会支持维持和游戏社会支持增加。在这些假定的中介因素中,只有游戏社会支持被发现可以调节治疗效果,即游戏社会支持的增加与创伤后应激障碍症状的减少有关。此外,作者还确定了一些调节因素:女孩在创伤后应激障碍症状上表现出更大的治疗益处;女孩、家庭规模较小的儿童以及从家庭以外的成年人那里获得社会支持的儿童在功能障碍上表现出更大的治疗益处。
研究结果为生态弹性理论框架提供了有限的证据。基于这些发现,作者建议在普遍预防(例如,通过游戏促进弹性)和选择性/指示性预防(例如,旨在减少创伤后应激症状的干预)之间进行更明确的区分。基于游戏的干预措施应注意排除有心理困扰的儿童。此外,选择女孩和社会弱势群体儿童可能会增强治疗效果。