Department of Nursing, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):377-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03346.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
The purpose of the study is to examine factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders, do-not-hospitalise orders and hospice care in older nursing home residents at admission.
Although hospice care is viewed as the 'gold standard,' geographic availability and financial reimbursement limits its use. Treatment restriction orders may represent alternative approaches to defining wishes for end-of-life care.
A descriptive correlational study design was employed to examine the use of four care directives and hospice in newly admitted older people NH residents using Maryland Minimum Data Set 2.0 and the On-Line Survey Certification and Reporting in 2000. Analyses reflected 10,023 unduplicated admission records from 77 NHs.
The prevalence of do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalise orders at admission was 28 and 3.4%, respectively. A very small percentage of residents received hospice care on admission (1.7%). Appropriately, health-related characteristics had a strong influence on use of do-not-resuscitate orders, do-not-hospitalise orders and hospice care. However, identified predictors were varied among do-not-resuscitate orders, do-not-hospitalise orders and hospice care. Moreover, multivariate logistical modelling found that non-Medicare insurance significantly influenced the likelihood of do-not-resuscitate orders, do-not-hospitalise orders and hospice uses; White race increased the likelihood of having a do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalise order. Treatment restriction orders were associated with an increased of likelihood of hospice use.
As policy and reimbursement barriers to hospice use are likely to persist, treatment restriction orders should be used to focus communication with residents, families and providers, with the ultimate goal of more widespread implementation of hospice care principles.
White race was consistently associated with increasing the likelihood of having do-not-resuscitate and do-not-hospitalise orders, supporting the importance of cultural sensitivity in advanced care planning. With the association between do-not-hospitalise orders and hospice use, treatment restriction orders should be used as potential triggers to prompting end-of-life care.
本研究旨在探讨入院时与不复苏、不住院和临终关怀相关的因素。
尽管临终关怀被视为“黄金标准”,但地理可用性和财务报销限制了其使用。治疗限制令可能代表着定义临终关怀意愿的替代方法。
采用描述性相关性研究设计,使用马里兰州 2.0 版最低数据集和 2000 年在线调查认证和报告,对新入院的老年人疗养院居民使用四项护理指令和临终关怀进行了研究。分析反映了来自 77 家疗养院的 10023 份无重复入院记录。
入院时不复苏和不住院的医嘱的患病率分别为 28%和 3.4%。在入院时接受临终关怀的居民比例非常小(1.7%)。适当的是,健康相关特征对不复苏医嘱、不住院医嘱和临终关怀的使用有很强的影响。然而,在不复苏医嘱、不住院医嘱和临终关怀中,确定的预测因素各不相同。此外,多变量逻辑建模发现,非医疗保险显著影响不复苏医嘱、不住院医嘱和临终关怀的使用可能性;白人种族增加了下达不复苏和不住院医嘱的可能性。治疗限制令与增加接受临终关怀的可能性相关。
由于临终关怀使用的政策和报销障碍可能持续存在,因此应使用治疗限制令来集中与居民、家庭和提供者进行沟通,最终目标是更广泛地实施临终关怀原则。
白人种族一直与增加下达不复苏和不住院医嘱的可能性相关,这支持了在高级护理计划中重视文化敏感性的重要性。由于不住院医嘱与临终关怀使用之间的关联,治疗限制令应作为提示临终关怀的潜在触发因素。