• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者中住院医师对标准化代码状态解释的使用情况。

Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients.

作者信息

Mittal Kriti, Sharma Kapil, Dangayach Neha, Raval Dhaval, Leung Katherine, George Susan, Abraham George

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014 Apr 14;4(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745
PMID:24765258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3992358/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is wide variability in the discussion of code status by residents among hospitalized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of a scripted code status explanation on patient understanding of choices pertaining to code status and end-of-life care.

METHODS

This was a single center, randomized trial in a teaching hospital. Patients were randomized to a control (questionnaire alone) or intervention arm (standardized explanation+ questionnaire). A composite score was generated based on patient responses to assess comprehension.

RESULTS

The composite score was 5.27 in the intervention compared to 4.93 in the control arm (p=0.066). The score was lower in older patients (p<0.001), patients with multiple comorbidities (p≤0.001), KATZ score <6 (p=0.008), and those living in an assisted living/nursing home (p=0.005). There were significant differences in patient understanding of the ability to receive chest compressions, intravenous fluids, and tube feeds by code status.

CONCLUSION

The scripted code status explanation did not significantly impact the composite score. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and type of residence demonstrated a significant association with patient understanding of code status choices.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Standardized discussion of code status and training in communication of end-of-life care merit further research.

摘要

目的

住院患者中,住院医师对代码状态的讨论存在很大差异。本研究的主要目的是确定一份书面代码状态解释对患者理解与代码状态及临终关怀相关选择的影响。

方法

这是在一家教学医院进行的单中心随机试验。患者被随机分为对照组(仅问卷调查)或干预组(标准化解释 + 问卷调查)。根据患者回答生成一个综合分数以评估理解情况。

结果

干预组的综合分数为5.27,而对照组为4.93(p = 0.066)。老年患者(p < 0.001)、患有多种合并症的患者(p≤0.001)、KATZ分数<6的患者(p = 0.008)以及住在辅助生活设施/养老院的患者(p = 0.005)的分数较低。患者对根据代码状态接受胸外按压、静脉输液和管饲的能力的理解存在显著差异。

结论

书面代码状态解释并未对综合分数产生显著影响。年龄、合并症、功能状态和居住类型与患者对代码状态选择的理解存在显著关联。

实践意义

代码状态的标准化讨论以及临终关怀沟通方面的培训值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92a5/3992358/2955d09b161c/JCHIMP-4-23745-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92a5/3992358/2955d09b161c/JCHIMP-4-23745-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92a5/3992358/2955d09b161c/JCHIMP-4-23745-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients.住院患者中住院医师对标准化代码状态解释的使用情况。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014 Apr 14;4(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745. eCollection 2014.
2
Unpacking resident-led code status discussions: results from a mixed methods study.剖析住院医师主导的代码状态讨论:一项混合方法研究的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):750-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2791-3. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
4
If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.如果被询问,住院患者将选择是否接受维持生命的治疗。
J Hosp Med. 2006 May;1(3):161-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.78.
5
Code status decision-making in a nursing home population: processes and outcomes.养老院人群中的医疗状态决策:过程与结果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Feb;43(2):113-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06375.x.
6
7
Advance care planning and end-of-life care for hospitalized nursing home residents.住院养老院居民的预立医疗计划与临终关怀
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 May;50(5):829-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50207.x.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Evaluation of a Mastery Learning Intervention on Hospitalists' Code Status Discussion Skills.针对住院医师临终状态讨论技能的掌握学习干预评估
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jun;53(6):1066-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.341. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
TRIAD VIII: Nationwide Multicenter Evaluation to Determine Whether Patient Video Testimonials Can Safely Help Ensure Appropriate Critical Versus End-of-Life Care.第八项三元组研究:全国多中心评估,以确定患者视频推荐能否安全地有助于确保适当的重症与临终关怀。
J Patient Saf. 2017 Jun;13(2):51-61. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000357.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Preferences for Code Status Discussions: A Randomized Trial of Information- vs. Patient Values-Centered Frameworks.患者对病情告知的偏好:一项关于以信息为中心与以患者价值观为中心框架的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun;40(8):1829-1835. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09243-2. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Association of Communication Interventions to Discuss Code Status With Patient Decisions for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.探讨患者是否选择不进行心肺复苏的沟通干预与决策的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5033.
3
Professionalism: hard to measure but you know it when you see it.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of a structured intervention to facilitate end-of-life decision making in patients with advanced cancer.随机对照试验:一项结构化干预措施,以促进晚期癌症患者的临终决策。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3403-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8872. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
2
Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp.使 7 月更安全:实习训练营中的基于模拟的精通学习。
Acad Med. 2013 Feb;88(2):233-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827bfc0a.
3
Randomized controlled trial of a video decision support tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making in advanced cancer.
专业素养:难以衡量,但当你看到时你就知道。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014 Apr 14;4(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v4.24226. eCollection 2014.
随机对照试验:视频决策支持工具对晚期癌症心肺复苏决策的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):380-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.9570. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
An educational intervention to improve resident comfort with communication at the end of life.提高住院医生在生命末期沟通舒适度的教育干预。
J Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):54-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0173. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
5
Improving residents' code status discussion skills: a randomized trial.提高住院医师关于患者意愿的讨论技能:一项随机试验
J Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;15(7):768-74. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0446. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
Addressing 'the elephant on the table': barriers to end of life care conversations in heart failure - a literature review and narrative synthesis.正视“显而易见的问题”:心力衰竭患者临终关怀对话的障碍——文献回顾与叙事综述。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;5(4):312-6. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32834b8c4d.
7
Facilitators and barriers for GP-patient communication in palliative care: a qualitative study among GPs, patients, and end-of-life consultants.在姑息治疗中促进全科医生与患者沟通的因素和障碍:一项针对全科医生、患者和临终顾问的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Apr;61(585):167-72. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X567081.
8
Why do patients agree to a "Do not resuscitate" or "Full code" order? Perspectives of medical inpatients.为什么患者会同意下达“不复苏”或“全面复苏”的医嘱?住院患者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):582-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1616-2. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Development and evaluation of a program to strengthen first year residents' proficiency in leading end-of-life discussions.一项旨在提高一年级住院医师进行临终讨论能力的项目的开发与评估。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Aug;28(5):328-34. doi: 10.1177/1049909110391646. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
10
Factors associated with treatment restriction orders and hospice in older nursing home residents.与老年疗养院居民的治疗限制令和临终关怀相关的因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):377-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03346.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.