• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再探精神科诊断的效度:临床医生提高精神科诊断效度指南

The Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis Revisited: The Clinician's Guide to Improve the Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis.

作者信息

Aboraya Ahmed, France Cheryl, Young John, Curci Kristina, Lepage James

机构信息

All from Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

出版信息

Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2005 Sep;2(9):48-55.

PMID:21120108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2993536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors reviewed the types and phases of validity of psychiatric diagnosis. In 1970, Robins and Guze proposed five phases to achieve valid classification of mental disorders: clinical description, laboratory study, exclusion of other disorders, follow-up study, and family study.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this paper are to review what has been learned since Robins and Guze's influential article as well as examine the impact of the new discoveries in neurosciences and neuroimaging on the practicing clinician.

METHOD

The authors reviewed the literature on the concept of validity in psychiatry with emphasis on the role of clinical training, the use of structured interviews and rating scales, and the importance of the new discoveries in neurosciences.

RESULTS

Robins and Guze's phases have been the cornerstone of construct validity in psychiatry at the level of researchers. In the absence of the gold standard of psychiatric diagnosis, Spitzer proposed the "LEAD," which is an acronym for longitudinal evaluation, and is done by expert clinicians utilizing all the data available. The LEAD standard is construct validity at the level of experts; however, guidelines are lacking to improve the validity skills of the practicing clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors propose the acronym DR.SEE, which stands for data, reference definitions, rating scales, clinical experience, and external validators. The authors recommend that clinicians use the DR.SEE paradigm to improve the validity of psychiatric diagnoses.

摘要

背景

作者回顾了精神疾病诊断有效性的类型和阶段。1970年,罗宾斯和古泽提出了五个阶段以实现精神障碍的有效分类:临床描述、实验室研究、排除其他疾病、随访研究和家族研究。

目的

本文的目的是回顾自罗宾斯和古泽发表具有影响力的文章以来所学到的知识,并研究神经科学和神经影像学的新发现对临床执业医生的影响。

方法

作者回顾了关于精神病学有效性概念的文献,重点关注临床培训的作用、结构化访谈和评定量表的使用以及神经科学新发现的重要性。

结果

罗宾斯和古泽提出的阶段一直是研究人员层面精神病学建构效度的基石。在缺乏精神疾病诊断金标准的情况下,斯皮策提出了“LEAD”,这是纵向评估的首字母缩写,由专家临床医生利用所有可用数据进行。LEAD标准是专家层面的建构效度;然而,缺乏提高临床执业医生效度技能的指南。

结论

作者提出了首字母缩写DR.SEE,代表数据、参考定义、评定量表、临床经验和外部验证者。作者建议临床医生使用DR.SEE范式来提高精神疾病诊断的有效性。

相似文献

1
The Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis Revisited: The Clinician's Guide to Improve the Validity of Psychiatric Diagnosis.再探精神科诊断的效度:临床医生提高精神科诊断效度指南
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2005 Sep;2(9):48-55.
2
The Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis Revisited: The Clinician's Guide to Improve the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis.再谈精神科诊断的可靠性:提高精神科诊断可靠性的临床医生指南。
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006 Jan;3(1):41-50.
3
Neuroscience, genetics, and the future of psychiatric diagnosis.神经科学、遗传学与精神疾病诊断的未来
Psychopathology. 2002 Mar-Jun;35(2-3):139-44. doi: 10.1159/000065134.
4
Searching for valid psychiatric phenotypes: discrete latent variable models.寻找有效的精神病学表型:离散潜在变量模型。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Jun;19(2):63-73. doi: 10.1002/mpr.301.
5
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
6
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
7
Muscle dysmorphia: A systematic and meta-analytic review of the literature to assess diagnostic validity.肌肉变形症:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析评估诊断有效性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Oct;53(10):1583-1604. doi: 10.1002/eat.23349. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
8
Is ADHD a valid disorder in children with intellectual delays?注意缺陷多动障碍在智力发育迟缓儿童中是一种有效的病症吗?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Sep;26(5):555-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 May 9.
9
Validity of the longitudinal, expert, all data procedure for psychiatric diagnosis in patients with psychoactive substance use disorders.精神活性物质使用障碍患者精神科诊断中纵向、专家、全数据程序的有效性
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Apr 14;45(1-2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)01349-5.
10
The Clinician's Subjective Experience during the Interaction with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience.临床医生与青少年精神科患者互动时的主观体验:临床医生主观体验评估的效度和信度。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(3):119-126. doi: 10.1159/000513769. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering hidden depression: the critical role of depression screening in sleep disorders at U.S. sleep centers.揭示隐匿性抑郁症:抑郁症筛查在美国睡眠中心睡眠障碍中的关键作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1449360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1449360. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric validation of the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool: Alcohol use disorder module.诊断评估研究工具:酒精使用障碍模块的心理测量学验证
Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Nov 18;60(1). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agae088.
3
Replicability and generalizability in population psychiatric neuroimaging.人群精神病学神经影像学中的可重复性和可推广性。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Nov;50(1):52-57. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01960-w. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the traumatogenic phenotype hypothesis of psychosis.对精神病创伤性表型假说的系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Aug 9;10(5):e146. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.52.
5
Virtual reality-assisted assessment of paranoid ideation in forensic psychiatric inpatients: A mixed-methods pilot study.虚拟现实辅助评估法医精神病住院患者的偏执观念:一项混合方法的试点研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 7;14:1242243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242243. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding mental health through computers: An introduction to computational psychiatry.通过计算机理解心理健康:计算精神病学导论。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 7;14:1092471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1092471. eCollection 2023.
7
Bipolar spectrum disorders in neurologic disorders.神经疾病中的双相谱系障碍。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 21;13:1046471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1046471. eCollection 2022.
8
The Relation Between the Paraphilias and Anxiety in Men: A Case-Control Study.男性性癖好与焦虑之间的关系:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4063-4084. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02346-z. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
9
The Effect of Virtual Reality on Emotional Response and Symptoms Provocation in Patients With OCD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.虚拟现实对强迫症患者情绪反应和症状激发的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;12:733584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.733584. eCollection 2021.
10
Machine Learning-Based Behavioral Diagnostic Tools for Depression: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.基于机器学习的抑郁症行为诊断工具:进展、挑战与未来方向
J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 26;11(10):957. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100957.

本文引用的文献

1
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
2
The value of positron emission tomography in the clinical evaluation of dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Feb;51(2):258-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51067.x.
3
Hindsight, foresight, and having it both ways: a rejoinder to R. L. Spitzer.后见之明、先见之明以及两全其美:对R.L.斯皮策的回应
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Aug;189(8):493-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200108000-00001.
4
Values and assumptions in the development of DSM-III and DSM-III-R: an insider's perspective and a belated response to Sadler, Hulgus, and Agich's "On values in recent American psychiatric classification".《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)制定过程中的价值观与假设:一位 insider 的视角以及对萨德勒、赫尔古斯和阿吉奇所著《论美国近期精神科分类中的价值观》的迟来回应
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Jun;189(6):351-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200106000-00002.
5
Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting.提高社区心理健康环境中诊断准确性的方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;157(10):1599-605. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1599.
6
Interrater reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating in a multicenter trial.一项多中心试验中临床痴呆评定量表的评定者间信度
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(5):558-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb05004.x.
7
Cross validation of a general population survey diagnostic interview: a comparison of CIS-R with SCAN ICD-10 diagnostic categories.一般人群调查诊断访谈的交叉验证:CIS-R与SCAN ICD-10诊断类别的比较。
Psychol Med. 1999 Sep;29(5):1029-42. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799008892.
8
The abduction of disorder in psychiatry.精神病学中对疾病的误判。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Aug;108(3):438-45. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.3.438.
9
The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.《迷你国际神经精神病学访谈量表(M.I.N.I.)》:一种针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)的结构化诊断性精神科访谈量表的开发与验证
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
10
Diagnosis and need for treatment are not the same.诊断和治疗需求并不相同。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;55(2):120. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.120.