Department of Anesthesia, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Endoscopy. 2010 Dec;42(12):1021-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255969. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
Carbon dioxide (CO (2)) insufflation for endoscopy has been reported to provide superior recovery and is expected to reduce the risk of serious complications, including air embolism and tension pneumothorax, whereas general anesthesia offers some advantages not found under intravenous sedation. Little is known about the effect of prolonged CO (2) insufflation into gastrointestinal tracts on arterial CO (2) tension (PaCO (2)). Here we introduce the use of general anesthesia with CO (2) insufflation for esophagogastroduodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
A prospective observational study was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. A total of 100 patients were scheduled for esophagogastroduodenal ESD under general anesthesia with CO (2) insufflation, using standardized anesthesia techniques and unchanged ventilatory settings. Arterial blood gas analyses were repeated at predetermined time intervals.
Of the initial 100 participants, 94 patients undergoing ESD and four patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection completed the study. The median procedure time was 122 minutes (range 29 - 309 minutes). The median baseline PaCO (2) of 28 mmHg increased to a median peak PaCO (2) of 39 mmHg ( P < 0.001), with marked inter-individual variability in the time courses of changes in PaCO (2). The correlation coefficient of PaCO (2) with the procedure time was low (r = 0.194; n = 577, P < 0.0001). FEV (1.0) % (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity) of < 70 % and esophagoscopy vs. gastroduodenoscopy were relative enhancement factors of PaCO (2).
Increases of PaCO (2) during esophagogastroduodenal ESD under general anesthesia with CO (2) insufflation remained within acceptable or readily controllable ranges, and are little enhanced by prolongation of the procedure. Esophagogastroduodenal ESD can be performed safely and feasibly with this procedure.
二氧化碳(CO2)内镜下充气已被报道可提供更好的恢复效果,并有望降低包括空气栓塞和张力性气胸在内的严重并发症的风险,而全身麻醉则提供了一些静脉镇静下无法获得的优势。关于长时间 CO2 充气进入胃肠道对动脉血二氧化碳张力(PaCO2)的影响知之甚少。在此,我们介绍了在 CO2 充气下全身麻醉用于食管胃十二指肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的应用。
一项前瞻性观察性研究在一家大学附属医院进行。共 100 例患者在 CO2 充气下全身麻醉下接受食管胃十二指肠 ESD,采用标准化的麻醉技术和不变的通气设置。在预定的时间间隔重复进行动脉血气分析。
在最初的 100 名参与者中,94 名接受 ESD 治疗的患者和 4 名接受内镜黏膜切除术的患者完成了研究。中位手术时间为 122 分钟(范围 29-309 分钟)。中位基线 PaCO2 为 28mmHg,增加至中位峰值 PaCO2 为 39mmHg(P<0.001),个体间 PaCO2 变化时间过程存在显著差异。PaCO2 与手术时间的相关系数较低(r=0.194;n=577,P<0.0001)。FEV(1.0)%(1 秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量)<70%和食管镜检查与胃十二指肠镜检查是 PaCO2 的相对增强因素。
在 CO2 充气下全身麻醉下进行食管胃十二指肠 ESD 时,PaCO2 的增加仍在可接受或易于控制的范围内,且手术时间延长对其影响不大。该方法可安全有效地进行食管胃十二指肠 ESD。