Suppr超能文献

经二氧化碳充气内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期结直肠肿瘤时二氧化碳分压的经皮监测:一项前瞻性研究。

Transcutaneous monitoring of partial pressure of carbon dioxide during endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasia with carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective study.

机构信息

Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2231-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0939-8. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors have reported that carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation is safe and effective for lengthy endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with the patient under conscious sedation. However, CO(2) monitoring has not been assessed to clarify whether partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO(2)) increases during this type of long procedure. This study aimed to monitor CO(2) before, during, and after ESD to investigate whether CO(2) insufflation is safe for patients receiving a lengthy ESD of early colorectal neoplasia under conscious sedation.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 35 consecutive patients who underwent ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Transcutaneous PCO(2) (PtcCO(2)) was measured with a noninvasive sensor before, during, and after ESD for patients under conscious sedation using midazolam.

RESULTS

The mean size of removed lesions was 44 ± 22 mm (range, 15-100 mm). The operation time was 90 ± 100 min (range, 15-600 mm). The dose of midazolam was 5.7 ± 4.0 mg (range, 2-19 mg). The mean PtcCO(2) was 41 ± 5 mmHg (range, 33-53 mmHg) before ESD and 44 ± 6 mmHg (range, 32-54 mmHg) afterward. The mean peak PtcCO(2) during ESD was 55 ± 7 mmHg (range, 39-78 mmHg), which was significantly higher than before or after ESD (p < 0.0001). However, no complication associated with CO(2) insufflation such as CO(2) narcosis, gas embolism, or arrhythmia needing treatment was seen in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that CO(2) insufflation is safe for patients receiving a lengthy colorectal ESD under conscious sedation.

摘要

背景

作者曾报道,在患者接受清醒镇静的情况下,二氧化碳(CO2)充气对于长程内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是安全且有效的。然而,尚未评估 CO2 监测以明确在这种长程手术过程中二氧化碳分压(PCO2)是否升高。本研究旨在 ESD 前、中、后监测 CO2,以探讨在清醒镇静下接受长程大肠早期肿瘤 ESD 的患者,CO2 充气是否安全。

方法

本研究前瞻性纳入了 35 例在国立癌症中心医院接受 ESD 的连续患者。在接受咪达唑仑清醒镇静下,使用非侵入性传感器在 ESD 前、中、后测量患者的经皮 PCO2(PtcCO2)。

结果

切除病变的平均大小为 44 ± 22 mm(范围,15-100 mm)。手术时间为 90 ± 100 min(范围,15-600 mm)。咪达唑仑用量为 5.7 ± 4.0 mg(范围,2-19 mg)。ESD 前 PtcCO2 平均为 41 ± 5 mmHg(范围,33-53 mmHg),ESD 后为 44 ± 6 mmHg(范围,32-54 mmHg)。ESD 期间 PtcCO2 的平均峰值为 55 ± 7 mmHg(范围,39-78 mmHg),显著高于 ESD 前或后(p < 0.0001)。然而,在任何情况下均未观察到与 CO2 充气相关的并发症,如 CO2 麻醉、气体栓塞或需要治疗的心律失常。

结论

本研究表明,在清醒镇静下接受长程大肠 ESD 的患者,CO2 充气是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验