Suppr超能文献

分析堕胎史与当前心理健康状况的关联:采用共同风险因素模型对全国共病调查的再分析。

Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health: A reanalysis of the National Comorbidity Survey using a common-risk-factors model.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Ste 335, Box 0744, San Francisco, CA 94143-0744, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

Abstract

Using the US National Comorbidity Survey (NCS), Coleman, Coyle, Shuping, and Rue (2009) published an analysis indicating that compared to women who had never had an abortion, women who had reported an abortion were at an increased risk of several anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders. Here, we show that those results are not replicable. That is, using the same data, sample, and codes as indicated by those authors, it is not possible to replicate the simple bivariate statistics testing the relationship of ever having had an abortion to each mental health disorder when no factors were controlled for in analyses (Table 2 in Coleman et al., 2009). Furthermore, among women with prior pregnancies in the NCS, we investigated whether having zero, one, or multiple abortions (abortion history) was associated with having a mood, anxiety, or substance use disorder at the time of the interview. In doing this, we tested two competing frameworks: the abortion-as-trauma versus the common-risk-factors approach. Our results support the latter framework. In the bivariate context when no other factors were included in models, abortion history was not related to having a mood disorder, but it was related to having an anxiety or substance use disorder. When prior mental health and violence experience were controlled in our models, no significant relation was found between abortion history and anxiety disorders. When these same risk factors and other background factors were controlled, women who had multiple abortions remained at an increased risk of having a substance use disorder compared to women who had no abortions, likely because we were unable to control for other risk factors associated with having an abortion and substance use. Policy, practice, and research should focus on assisting women at greatest risk of having unintended pregnancies and having poor mental health-those with violence in their lives and prior mental health problems.

摘要

利用美国国家共病调查(NCS),Coleman、Coyle、Shuping 和 Rue(2009)发表了一项分析结果,表明与从未堕胎的女性相比,报告有过堕胎经历的女性更易患上多种焦虑症、心境障碍和物质使用障碍。在这里,我们表明这些结果无法复制。也就是说,使用与作者所指出的相同的数据、样本和代码,当在分析中不控制任何因素时,无法复制简单的双变量统计测试曾经堕胎与每种心理健康障碍之间关系的结果(Coleman 等人,2009 年的表 2)。此外,在 NCS 中有过先前妊娠的女性中,我们调查了在没有其他因素影响的情况下,有过零次、一次或多次堕胎(堕胎史)是否与在访谈时患有心境、焦虑或物质使用障碍有关。这样做时,我们测试了两种相互竞争的框架:堕胎作为创伤与共同风险因素方法。我们的结果支持后一种框架。在双变量情况下,当没有其他因素纳入模型时,堕胎史与心境障碍无关,但与焦虑症或物质使用障碍有关。当在我们的模型中控制先前的心理健康和暴力经历时,堕胎史与焦虑障碍之间没有发现显著关系。当控制这些相同的风险因素和其他背景因素时,与没有堕胎的女性相比,有多次堕胎史的女性仍然更易患上物质使用障碍,这可能是因为我们无法控制与堕胎和物质使用相关的其他风险因素。政策、实践和研究应侧重于帮助那些有意外怀孕和心理健康不良风险的女性,包括生活中有暴力行为和先前有心理健康问题的女性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验