• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术中导管抽吸血栓切除术安全且可能有效:一项初步回顾性研究。

Catheter aspiration thrombectomy during carotid stenting is safe and potentially efficacious: a pilot retrospective study.

作者信息

Shabaneh B, Dougherty K, Hernandez E, Strickman N, Krajcer Z

机构信息

Texas Heart Institute at St Lukes Episcopal Hospital, Huston, TX, USA. zvonkomd@aol. com

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Dec;51(6):865-72.

PMID:21124284
Abstract

AIM

Despite distal embolic protection (DEP) during carotid artery stenting (CAS), there is still an appreciable risk of stroke, especially in symptomatic patients and octogenerians. The mechanism of embolic events is possibly related to microembolization of debris remaining on or forming on stent struts. We evaluated the safety of using aspiration thrombectomy after CAS.

METHODS

Between August 2006 and July 2010, 80 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (>80%) underwent CAS utilizing DEP. After completion of CAS and before removal of DEP, an aspiration catheter was passed through the CAS segment. Both extracted volume and the DEP were visually examined. The primary endpoint was stroke and death at 30 days. These patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 (N=7) comprised those who had aspiration thrombectomy to treat no-flow or an acute neurologic change that occurred during CAS. Group 2 (N=73) comprised patients that underwent prophylactic aspiration thrombectomy. Outcomes were then compared to a control group (N=925) who had CAS with DEP, but without aspiration thrombectomy.

RESULTS

Moderate to large amounts of debris were extracted from the CAS segment in the majority of thrombectomy patients (90%). There was one death (1%) and one stroke (1%) in the thrombectomy groups, while the control group had 3.0% rate of death and stroke (P=0.83).

CONCLUSION

Aspiration thrombectomy recovers large to moderate amounts of debris and is safe and does not increase adverse periprocedural events. A large scale, randomized trial with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is needed to further investigate our findings.

摘要

目的

尽管在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)期间采用了远端栓子保护(DEP),但仍存在明显的卒中风险,尤其是在有症状的患者和八旬老人中。栓塞事件的机制可能与残留在支架支柱上或在支架支柱上形成的碎片的微栓塞有关。我们评估了CAS术后使用血栓抽吸术的安全性。

方法

在2006年8月至2010年7月期间,80例有症状和无症状的严重颈动脉狭窄(>80%)患者接受了采用DEP的CAS。在CAS完成后且在移除DEP之前,将一根抽吸导管穿过CAS节段。对抽出的体积和DEP进行肉眼检查。主要终点是30天时的卒中和死亡。这些患者被分为两组,第1组(n = 7)包括那些进行血栓抽吸术以治疗CAS期间出现的无血流或急性神经功能改变的患者。第2组(n = 73)包括接受预防性血栓抽吸术的患者。然后将结果与一组对照组(n = 925)进行比较,该对照组接受了采用DEP的CAS,但未进行血栓抽吸术。

结果

在大多数接受血栓抽吸术的患者(90%)中,从CAS节段抽出了中等到大量的碎片。血栓抽吸术组有1例死亡(1%)和1例卒中(1%),而对照组的死亡率和卒中率为3.0%(P = 0.83)。

结论

血栓抽吸术可回收大量到中等量的碎片,且安全,不会增加围手术期不良事件。需要进行一项大规模的、采用磁共振成像(MRI)的随机试验来进一步研究我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Catheter aspiration thrombectomy during carotid stenting is safe and potentially efficacious: a pilot retrospective study.颈动脉支架置入术中导管抽吸血栓切除术安全且可能有效:一项初步回顾性研究。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Dec;51(6):865-72.
2
Benefits of catheter thrombectomy during carotid stenting: a preliminary study.颈动脉支架置入术中导管血栓切除术的益处:一项初步研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(5):404-8.
3
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
4
Clinical outcomes following protected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.症状性和无症状性患者行颈动脉保护支架置入术后的临床转归。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):298-307. doi: 10.1583/09-2997.1.
5
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial.在颈动脉支架置入术中 INVATEC MO.MA 近端脑保护装置的安全性和有效性:ARMOUR 关键试验结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul 1;76(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22439.
7
Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中使用脑保护装置预防栓塞的初步经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1175-85. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.129488.
8
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
Acute and long-term results of carotid stenting under proximal embolic protection using the Gore Flow Reversal System.应用戈尔血流反转系统行近端栓塞保护下颈动脉支架置入术的即刻和远期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):133-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24499. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
10
Significance of combining distal filter protection and a guiding catheter with temporary balloon occlusion for carotid artery stenting: clinical results and evaluation of debris capture.远端滤器保护联合引导导管与临时球囊阻断用于颈动脉支架置入术的意义:临床结果及碎片捕获评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;26(7):929-36. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.04.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病支架置入术后选择性扩张与标准扩张的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.