Suppr超能文献

症状性和无症状性患者行颈动脉保护支架置入术后的临床转归。

Clinical outcomes following protected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):298-307. doi: 10.1583/09-2997.1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with routine use of a cerebral embolic protection device (EPD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 490 consecutive patients (365 men; mean age 70.7+/-8.5 years) who underwent CAS with EPD between January 1999 and December 2007 at 2 institutions with large referral practices. There were 163 symptomatic patients with stenosis >or=50% and 327 asymptomatic patients with >or=80% diameter stenosis treated in 536 CAS procedures. Nearly a quarter (116, 23.7%) of the cohort had diabetes. High-risk surgical features were present in 141 (28.8%): 73 (14.9%) aged >or=80 years, 25 (5.1%) with significant heart disease, 23 (4.6%) with postsurgical restenosis, and 16 (3.2%) with contralateral carotid occlusion. An EPD was successfully placed in 512 (95.5%) patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of any stroke within 30 days was 3.3% (16/490), of which the majority (13, 2.6%) were ipsilateral [5 (1.0%) major and 8 (1.6%) minor]. The incidence of major adverse events (MAE), i.e., any stroke, death or myocardial infarction, within 30 days was 3.7% (18/490); the incidence of 30-day any stroke/death was 3.7% (18/490), while the cumulative incidence of any stroke/death at 1 year was 6.1% (30/490). In symptomatic patients, the 30-day MAE rate was 6.7% (11/163) versus 2.1% (7/237) in the asymptomatic group (p = 0.02). A subgroup analysis based on surgical risk showed that the 30-day MAE rate was similar between high-risk and non-high-risk patients [4.9% (7/144) versus 3.2% (11/346); p = 0.5].

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world cohort, CAS with routine use of EPDs was technically feasible, clinically safe, and associated with a low rate of periprocedural and 1-year events; results were similar irrespective of surgical risk.

摘要

目的

评估在常规使用脑保护装置(EPD)的情况下行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)患者的临床结局。

方法

对 1999 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月在两家具有大型转诊业务的机构中接受 EPD 辅助 CAS 治疗的 490 例连续患者(365 例男性;平均年龄 70.7±8.5 岁)进行回顾性队列分析。163 例症状性患者狭窄程度>50%,327 例无症状患者狭窄程度>80%,共进行 536 例 CAS 手术。该队列中有近四分之一(116 例,23.7%)患有糖尿病。141 例患者具有高危手术特征(28.8%):73 例(14.9%)年龄>80 岁,25 例(5.1%)患有严重心脏病,23 例(4.6%)为术后再狭窄,16 例(3.2%)为对侧颈动脉闭塞。512 例(95.5%)患者成功放置了 EPD。

结果

30 天内任何卒中的发生率为 3.3%(16/490),其中大多数(13 例,2.6%)为同侧[5 例(1.0%)为主要卒中,8 例(1.6%)为次要卒中]。30 天内主要不良事件(MAE),即任何卒中和死亡或心肌梗死的发生率为 3.7%(18/490);30 天内任何卒中和死亡的发生率为 3.7%(18/490),而 1 年时任何卒中和死亡的累积发生率为 6.1%(30/490)。在有症状的患者中,30 天 MAE 发生率为 6.7%(11/163),而无症状患者为 2.1%(7/237)(p=0.02)。基于手术风险的亚组分析显示,高危患者与非高危患者的 30 天 MAE 发生率相似[4.9%(7/144)与 3.2%(11/346);p=0.5]。

结论

在这项大型真实世界队列研究中,常规使用 EPD 的 CAS 技术上是可行的,临床上是安全的,围手术期和 1 年事件发生率较低;结果与手术风险无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验