• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于在成人重症监护病房(SuDDICU 研究)中使用 SDD 的感知风险、益处和障碍的研究。

A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (the SuDDICU study).

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Av, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2010 Dec 3;11:117. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-117.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-11-117
PMID:21129208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3017022/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital acquired infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and markedly increased health care costs. Critically ill patients who require management in an Intensive Care Unit are particularly susceptible to these infections which are associated with a very high mortality. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) may reduce these infections and improve mortality but it has not been widely adopted into practice. We aim to 1. Clarify reasons why clinicians have avoided implementing SDD into clinical practice despite the current best-evidence 2. Describe barriers to SDD implementation and 3. Identify what further evidence is required before full scale clinical implementation would be considered appropriate and feasible.

METHODS

We have developed an international 'multi-lens' approach to investigate SDD from several perspectives. In case studies we will identify accounts of implementation of SDD in practice, in terms of the behaviours performed by the full range of individual clinicians, accounts of how SDD was first introduced into the Unit and specific content that may be used to populate the content of behaviour change techniques to be used in an implementation intervention and procedures to consider in order to deliver an implementation trial. In a 4 round Delphi study we will identify the range of stakeholders' beliefs, views and perceived barriers relating to the use of SDD. We will generate hypotheses about key beliefs about SDD and will inform the feasibility of any future randomised controlled trial. In large-scale nationwide postal questionnaire surveys of the state of current practice we will identify the factors predicting acceptability of an effectiveness or implementation trial using, and informed by, the theoretical domains structure. In semi-structured interviews with active international clinical trialists we will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and identify challenges and barriers to undertaking research in the field of SDD research.

DISCUSSION

We believe these methods will allow us to determine whether clinical implementation trials or further large effectiveness trials are required before full scale implementation into clinical practice.

摘要

背景

医院获得性感染是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,显著增加了医疗保健成本。需要在重症监护病房进行治疗的重症患者特别容易受到这些感染的影响,这些感染与极高的死亡率有关。选择性消化道去污染(SDD)可能会减少这些感染并提高死亡率,但尚未广泛应用于实践。我们的目的是:1. 澄清为什么尽管目前有最佳证据,但临床医生仍避免将 SDD 应用于临床实践;2. 描述 SDD 实施的障碍;3. 确定在全面临床实施之前需要哪些进一步的证据,才能认为是合适和可行的。

方法

我们采用了一种国际“多视角”方法,从多个角度研究 SDD。在案例研究中,我们将根据所有临床医生的行为,确定 SDD 在实践中的实施情况,以及 SDD 首次引入单位的情况,以及可能用于填充行为变化技术内容的特定内容,这些技术将用于实施干预措施,并考虑为实施试验提供服务。在四轮 Delphi 研究中,我们将确定与 SDD 使用相关的利益相关者的信念、观点和感知障碍的范围。我们将生成有关 SDD 的关键信念的假设,并为任何未来的随机对照试验的可行性提供信息。在全国范围内大规模的邮政问卷调查中,我们将根据理论领域结构,确定预测有效性或实施试验可接受性的因素,并告知其实施。在与积极的国际临床试验人员的半结构化访谈中,我们将评估随机对照试验的可行性,并确定在 SDD 研究领域进行研究的挑战和障碍。

讨论

我们相信这些方法将使我们能够确定在全面实施于临床实践之前是否需要进行临床实施试验或进一步的大型有效性试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/3017022/e604bbd8e3a5/1745-6215-11-117-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/3017022/e604bbd8e3a5/1745-6215-11-117-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1c/3017022/e604bbd8e3a5/1745-6215-11-117-1.jpg

相似文献

1
A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (the SuDDICU study).一项关于在成人重症监护病房(SuDDICU 研究)中使用 SDD 的感知风险、益处和障碍的研究。
Trials. 2010 Dec 3;11:117. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-117.
2
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients treated in intensive care units: a mixed-methods feasibility study (the SuDDICU study).重症监护病房中危重症患者的消化道选择性去污:一项混合方法可行性研究(SuDDICU研究)
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(25):1-170. doi: 10.3310/hta18250.
3
Clinical stakeholders' opinions on the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients in intensive care units: an international Delphi study.临床利益相关者对重症监护病房危重症患者使用消化道选择性去污的意见:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Crit Care. 2013 Nov 8;17(6):R266. doi: 10.1186/cc13096.
4
Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study.使用选择性肠道去污染在危重症儿童中的应用: PICnIC 一项先导 RCT 和混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Feb;28(8):1-84. doi: 10.3310/HDKV1008.
5
Clinical components and associated behavioural aspects of a complex healthcare intervention: multi-methods study of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critical care.一项复杂医疗保健干预措施的临床组成部分及相关行为方面:重症监护中消化道选择性去污的多方法研究
Aust Crit Care. 2013 Nov;26(4):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: an international, theoretically informed interview study.医护人员对消化道选择性去污的看法:一项基于理论的国际访谈研究。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Clinician views on selective decontamination of the digestive tract in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: A survey.重症监护病房中机械通气患者消化道选择性去污的临床医生观点:一项调查
Aust Crit Care. 2025 May;38(3):101155. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101155. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
8
Cost-effectiveness of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) versus selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in intensive care units with low levels of antimicrobial resistance: an individual patient data meta-analysis.在抗菌药物耐药性水平较低的重症监护病房中,选择性消化道去污(SDD)与选择性口咽去污(SOD)的成本效益:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e028876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028876.
9
Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: protocol for the Paediatric Intensive Care and Infection Control (PICnIC) pilot study.在危重症儿童中使用选择性肠道去污染:儿科重症监护和感染控制(PICnIC)试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):e061838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061838.
10
Physicians' and nurses' opinions on selective decontamination of the digestive tract and selective oropharyngeal decontamination: a survey.医务人员对消化道选择性去污染和选择性口腔去污染的看法:一项调查。
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R132. doi: 10.1186/cc9180. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients (SuDDICU) crossover, cluster randomised controlled trial.重症监护病房患者消化道选择性去污(SuDDICU)交叉、整群随机对照试验的方案摘要和统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(2):183-193. doi: 10.51893/2021.2.oa5. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury.影响重症监护病房医师对严重创伤性脑损伤成年危重症患者撤生命支持治疗决策的因素。
CMAJ. 2019 Jun 17;191(24):E652-E663. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190154.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour.基于证据选择行为改变干预设计理论:运用基于理论构建领域的方法理解临床医生的输血行为
Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;14(Pt 4):625-46. doi: 10.1348/135910708X397025. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
2
Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients.重症监护病房患者消化道和口咽的去污处理
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 1;360(1):20-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800394.
3
Use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in United Kingdom intensive care units.
Barriers and Facilitators of Intensivists' Adherence to Hyperinsulinemia-Euglycemia Therapy in the Treatment of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning.
强化治疗医生在钙通道阻滞剂中毒治疗中遵循高胰岛素血症-正常血糖疗法的障碍与促进因素
J Med Toxicol. 2018 Dec;14(4):283-294. doi: 10.1007/s13181-018-0676-2. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
5
The ethics of future trials: qualitative analysis of physicians' decision making.未来试验的伦理:医生决策的定性分析
Trials. 2016 Jan 6;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1137-8.
6
Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis.选择性消化道或口咽去污与局部口咽氯己定预防普通重症监护患者死亡:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 31;348:g2197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2197.
7
Severe sepsis and septic shock: management and performance improvement.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克:管理和绩效改进。
Virulence. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):190-9. doi: 10.4161/viru.27409. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南,2012 年。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework.行为改变理论综合为一组理论分类:引入关于理论领域框架的主题系列。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-35.
英国重症监护病房中消化道选择性去污的应用。
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):46-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05676.x.
4
The Scottish Patient Safety Alliance.苏格兰患者安全联盟。
Natl Med J India. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):47-8.
5
IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol.执行一项针对一般实践中急性腰痛的基于证据的管理的临床实践指南(IMPLEMENT):集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2008 Feb 22;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-11.
6
Developing the content of two behavioural interventions: using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #1.制定两种行为干预措施的内容:使用基于理论的干预措施促进全科医生对上呼吸道感染的管理且不开具抗生素处方#1。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 14;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-11.
7
Testing a TheoRY-inspired MEssage ('TRY-ME'): a sub-trial within the Ontario Printed Educational Message (OPEM) trial.测试基于理论的信息(TRY-ME):安大略印刷教育信息(OPEM)试验中的一个子试验。
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 26;2:39. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-39.
8
Translating clinicians' beliefs into implementation interventions (TRACII): a protocol for an intervention modeling experiment to change clinicians' intentions to implement evidence-based practice.将临床医生的信念转化为实施干预措施(TRACII):一项干预模型实验的方案,旨在改变临床医生实施循证实践的意愿。
Implement Sci. 2007 Aug 16;2:27. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-27.
9
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.消化道选择性去污可降低重症患者的细菌血流感染及死亡率。随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Mar;65(3):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.014. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
10
Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion.德尔菲专家小组反应特征的稳定性:自展数据扩展的应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Dec 1;5:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-37.