Russell Steven J, El-Khatib Firas H, Nathan David M, Damiano Edward R
Diabetes Unit and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1288-304. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400602.
During a previous clinical trial of a closed-loop blood glucose (BG) control system that administered insulin and microdose glucagon subcutaneously, glucagon was not uniformly effective in preventing hypoglycemia (BG<70 mg/dl). After a global adjustment of control algorithm parameters used to model insulin absorption and clearance to more closely match insulin pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters observed in the study cohort, administration of glucagon by the control system was more effective in preventing hypoglycemia. We evaluated the role of plasma insulin and plasma glucagon levels in determining whether glucagon was effective in preventing hypoglycemia.
We identified and analyzed 36 episodes during which glucagon was given and categorized them as either successful or unsuccessful in preventing hypoglycemia.
In 20 of the 36 episodes, glucagon administration prevented hypoglycemia. In the remaining 16, BG fell below 70 mg/dl (12 of the 16 occurred during experiments performed before PK parameters were adjusted). The (dimensionless) levels of plasma insulin (normalized relative to each subject's baseline insulin level) were significantly higher during episodes ending in hypoglycemia (5.2 versus 3.7 times the baseline insulin level, p=.01). The relative error in the control algorithm's online estimate of the instantaneous plasma insulin level was also higher during episodes ending in hypoglycemia (50 versus 30%, p=.003), as were the peak plasma glucagon levels (183 versus 116 pg/ml, p=.007, normal range 50-150 pg/ml) and mean plasma glucagon levels (142 versus 75 pg/ml, p=.02). Relative to mean plasma insulin levels, mean plasma glucagon levels tended to be 59% higher during episodes ending in hypoglycemia, although this result was not found to be statistically significant (p=.14). The rate of BG descent was also significantly greater during episodes ending in hypoglycemia (1.5 versus 1.0 mg/dl/min, p=.02).
Microdose glucagon administration was relatively ineffective in preventing hypoglycemia when plasma insulin levels exceeded the controller's online estimate by >60%. After the algorithm PK parameters were globally adjusted, insulin dosing was more conservative and microdose glucagon administration was very effective in reducing hypoglycemia while maintaining normal plasma glucagon levels. Improvements in the accuracy of the controller's online estimate of plasma insulin levels could be achieved if ultrarapid-acting insulin formulations could be developed with faster absorption and less intra- and intersubject variability than the current insulin analogs available today.
在一项关于闭环血糖(BG)控制系统的前期临床试验中,该系统通过皮下注射胰岛素和微量胰高血糖素,结果发现胰高血糖素在预防低血糖(BG<70mg/dl)方面并非始终有效。在对用于模拟胰岛素吸收和清除的控制算法参数进行全面调整,使其更紧密地匹配研究队列中观察到的胰岛素药代动力学(PK)参数后,该控制系统给予的胰高血糖素在预防低血糖方面更有效。我们评估了血浆胰岛素和血浆胰高血糖素水平在确定胰高血糖素预防低血糖是否有效的作用。
我们识别并分析了36次给予胰高血糖素的情况,并将其分类为预防低血糖成功或失败。
在36次情况中的20次,给予胰高血糖素预防了低血糖。在其余16次中,BG降至70mg/dl以下(16次中的12次发生在PK参数调整前进行的实验中)。在以低血糖告终的情况中,血浆胰岛素(相对于每个受试者的基线胰岛素水平进行标准化)水平(无量纲)显著更高(是基线胰岛素水平的5.2倍 vs 3.7倍,p = 0.01)。在以低血糖告终的情况中,控制算法对瞬时血浆胰岛素水平的在线估计的相对误差也更高(50% vs 30%,p = 0.003),血浆胰高血糖素峰值水平(183 vs 116pg/ml,p = 0.007,正常范围50 - 150pg/ml)和平均血浆胰高血糖素水平(142 vs 75pg/ml,p = 0.02)也是如此。相对于平均血浆胰岛素水平,在以低血糖告终的情况中,平均血浆胰高血糖素水平往往高出59%,尽管这一结果未发现具有统计学意义(p = 0.14)。在以低血糖告终的情况中,BG下降速率也显著更大(1.5 vs 1.0mg/dl/分钟,p = 0.02)。
当血浆胰岛素水平超过控制器的在线估计值>60%时,给予微量胰高血糖素预防低血糖相对无效。在对算法PK参数进行全面调整后,胰岛素给药更为保守,给予微量胰高血糖素在降低低血糖的同时维持正常血浆胰高血糖素水平方面非常有效。如果能够开发出吸收更快、受试者内和受试者间变异性比目前可用的胰岛素类似物更小的超短效胰岛素制剂,那么控制器对血浆胰岛素水平的在线估计准确性将会提高。