Kovatchev Boris, Cobelli Claudio, Renard Eric, Anderson Stacey, Breton Marc, Patek Stephen, Clarke William, Bruttomesso Daniela, Maran Alberto, Costa Silvana, Avogaro Angelo, Dalla Man Chiara, Facchinetti Andrea, Magni Lalo, De Nicolao Giuseppe, Place Jerome, Farret Anne
Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;4(6):1374-81. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400611.
In 2008-2009, the first multinational study was completed comparing closed-loop control (artificial pancreas) to state-of-the-art open-loop therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
The design of the control algorithm was done entirely in silico, i.e., using computer simulation experiments with N=300 synthetic "subjects" with T1DM instead of traditional animal trials. The clinical experiments recruited 20 adults with T1DM at the Universities of Virginia (11); Padova, Italy (6); and Montpellier, France (3). Open-loop and closed-loop admission was scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, continued for 22 h (14.5 h of which were in closed loop), and used a continuous glucose monitor and an insulin pump. The only difference between the two sessions was that insulin dosing was performed by the patient under a physician's supervision during open loop, whereas insulin dosing was performed by a control algorithm during closed loop.
In silico design resulted in rapid (less than 6 months compared to years of animal trials) and cost-effective system development, testing, and regulatory approvals in the United States, Italy, and France. In the clinic, compared to open-loop, closed-loop control reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia (blood glucose below 3.9 mmol/liter) from 23 to 5 episodes (p<.01) and increased the amount of time spent overnight within the target range (3.9 to 7.8 mmol/liter) from 64% to 78% (p=.03).
In silico experiments can be used as viable alternatives to animal trials for the preclinical testing of insulin treatment strategies. Compared to open-loop treatment under identical conditions, closed-loop control improves the overnight regulation of diabetes.
2008年至2009年,完成了第一项跨国研究,比较闭环控制(人工胰腺)与1型糖尿病(T1DM)成人的最先进开环治疗。
控制算法的设计完全在计算机上进行,即使用N = 300名患有T1DM的合成“受试者”进行计算机模拟实验,而不是传统的动物试验。临床实验在弗吉尼亚大学(11名)、意大利帕多瓦大学(6名)和法国蒙彼利埃大学(3名)招募了20名患有T1DM的成年人。开环和闭环治疗安排相隔3 - 4周,持续22小时(其中14.5小时为闭环),并使用连续血糖监测仪和胰岛素泵。两次治疗之间的唯一区别是,开环期间胰岛素给药由患者在医生监督下进行,而闭环期间胰岛素给药由控制算法进行。
计算机设计导致在美国、意大利和法国快速(与数年的动物试验相比不到6个月)且具有成本效益的系统开发、测试和监管批准。在临床中,与开环相比,闭环控制将夜间低血糖(血糖低于3.9毫摩尔/升)从23次发作减少到5次发作(p <.01),并将夜间处于目标范围(3.9至7.8毫摩尔/升)的时间从64%增加到78%(p =.03)。
计算机实验可作为胰岛素治疗策略临床前测试中动物试验的可行替代方法。与相同条件下的开环治疗相比,闭环控制改善了糖尿病的夜间调节。