School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):936-42. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
Can conscious awareness be ascertained from physiological responses alone? We evaluate a novel learning-based procedure permitting detection of conscious awareness without reliance on language comprehension or behavioural responses. The method exploits a situation whereby only consciously detected violations of an expectation alter skin conductance responses (SCRs). Thirty participants listened to sequences of piano notes that, without their being told, predicted a pleasant fanfare or an aversive noise according to an abstract rule. Stimuli were presented without distraction (attended), or while distracted by a visual task to remove awareness of the rule (unattended). A test phase included occasional violations of the rule. Only participants attending the sounds reported awareness of violations and only they showed significantly greater SCR for noise occurring in violation, vs. accordance, with the rule. Our results establish theoretically significant dissociations between conscious and unconscious processing and furnish new opportunities for clinical assessment of residual consciousness in patient populations.
仅凭生理反应能否确定意识的存在?我们评估了一种新的基于学习的方法,可以在不依赖语言理解或行为反应的情况下检测意识的存在。该方法利用了这样一种情况,即只有有意识地察觉到违反了期望,才会改变皮肤电反应 (SCR)。三十名参与者听了一系列钢琴音符,在没有被告知的情况下,根据一个抽象规则预测一个愉快的号角声或一个不愉快的噪音。刺激在不分散注意力(注意)的情况下呈现,或者在被视觉任务分散注意力以去除对规则的意识(不注意)的情况下呈现。测试阶段包括偶尔违反规则。只有注意声音的参与者报告了对违反的意识,并且只有他们在违反规则时对噪音的皮肤电反应显著大于符合规则时的皮肤电反应。我们的结果在理论上确立了有意识和无意识处理之间的显著差异,并为评估患者群体中残留意识的临床评估提供了新的机会。