Suppr超能文献

单纯性肺包虫囊肿的外科治疗:囊内翻还是不囊内翻?

Surgery of uncomplicated pulmonary hydatid cysts: capitonnage or uncapitonnage?

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2011;9(3):221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.11.014. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare two methods of capitonnage and uncapitonnage in the surgery of uncomplicated pulmonary hydatid cysts.

METHODS

502 patients with pulmonary hydatid cysts who were managed surgically were evaluated retrospectively from 1994 to 2007. The medical records and types of surgery of 234 patients with intact pulmonary hydatid cysts were collected. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were operated using capitonnage and group 2 patients using uncapitonnage methods. Postoperative complications of two groups were compared.

RESULTS

84 patients of group 1 with a mean age of 28.81 ± 9.37 years were operated using capitonnage method and 150 patients of group 2 with a mean age of 31.04 ± 8.62 years without capitonnage method. In the comparison of postoperative complications (pneumothorax, empyema and pneumonia) in two groups the results obtained from group 1 were significantly more advantageous over group 2 (P < 0.001). Total hospitalization time of group 1 was (5.2 ± 2.3) days and (5.9 ± 3.1) days for group 2 (P = 0.03). The duration of air leak was 2.1 ± 1.8 days for group 1, and 6.7 ± 3.5 days for group 2 (P < 0.001). There was significant statistical difference between two groups regarding the development of prolonged air leak and empyema. One and three cases of recurrence were observed in group 1 and group 2 respectively. There was no significant difference regarding the rate of disease recurrence between two groups. No mortality was reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the capitonnage method has more advantages in surgery of uncomplicated pulmonary hydatid cysts.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种方法(荷包缝合与非荷包缝合)在单纯性肺包虫囊肿手术中的应用。

方法

回顾性分析 1994 年至 2007 年间 502 例接受手术治疗的单纯性肺包虫囊肿患者。收集了 234 例完整肺包虫囊肿患者的病历和手术类型。将患者分为两组。第 1 组患者采用荷包缝合术,第 2 组患者采用非荷包缝合术。比较两组患者的术后并发症。

结果

第 1 组 84 例患者的平均年龄为 28.81±9.37 岁,采用荷包缝合术,第 2 组 150 例患者的平均年龄为 31.04±8.62 岁,未采用荷包缝合术。在两组患者术后并发症(气胸、脓胸和肺炎)的比较中,第 1 组的结果明显优于第 2 组(P<0.001)。第 1 组的总住院时间为(5.2±2.3)天,第 2 组为(5.9±3.1)天(P=0.03)。第 1 组的漏气持续时间为 2.1±1.8 天,第 2 组为 6.7±3.5 天(P<0.001)。两组在发生长时间漏气和脓胸方面有显著的统计学差异。第 1 组和第 2 组分别有 1 例和 3 例复发。两组疾病复发率无显著差异。两组均无死亡病例。

结论

我们认为荷包缝合术在单纯性肺包虫囊肿手术中具有更多优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验