SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Marine Environmental Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Jan 15;409(4):704-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.035. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
Extrapolation of ecotoxicological data from temperate species for use in risk assessment in the polar environments may be difficult since polar organisms as a rule differ from temperate species in terms of life span length, developmental time, surface-to-volume ratios, metabolic rates, total energy usage and lipid content for energy storage. In the current work we performed a comparative study where two closely related and morphologically similar copepod species, Calanus finmarchicus (temperate-boreal) and Calanus glacialis (arctic), were exposed to water accommodated fractions (WAF) of oil in a series of parallel experiments. The two species, adapted to 10°C and 2°C, respectively, were compared on the basis of acute ecotoxicity (LC(50)) and the WAF-mediated induction of the gene encoding glutathione S-transferase (GST). In addition, an experiment was conducted in order to reveal relationships between lipid content and acute toxicity. LC(50) values differed between the two species, and the Arctic copepod appeared less sensitive than the temperate-boreal species. The lipid contents of the two species, measured biometrically, were comparable, and the relationships between lipid content and response (reduced survival) to acute WAF exposure followed the same trend: Lipid-rich copepods survived longer than lipid-poor copepods at the same exposure concentration. In terms of GST expression, both species showed concentration-dependent and exposure time-dependent trends. However, as for the acute toxicity data, the Arctic copepod appeared to respond slower and with a lower intensity. From the study it can be concluded that temperature and lipid content are important factors for assessing differences between temperate and Arctic species, and that a delayed response in organisms adapted to low temperatures needs to be corrected for when extrapolating toxicity data from species with other temperature optimums for use in Arctic environments.
将来自温带物种的生态毒理学数据外推用于极地环境中的风险评估可能很困难,因为极地生物在寿命、发育时间、表面积与体积比、代谢率、总能量消耗和用于能量储存的脂质含量等方面通常与温带物种不同。在目前的工作中,我们进行了一项比较研究,其中两种密切相关且形态相似的桡足类动物,即长额冷水性狭鳕(温带-北方)和北极冷水性狭鳕(北极),在一系列平行实验中暴露于油的水可容纳分数(WAF)中。这两个物种分别适应于 10°C 和 2°C,根据急性生态毒性(LC50)和 WAF 介导的谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶(GST)基因的诱导,对它们进行了比较。此外,还进行了一项实验以揭示脂质含量与急性毒性之间的关系。两种物种的 LC50 值不同,北极桡足类动物的敏感性似乎低于温带-北方物种。通过生物计量学测量的两种物种的脂质含量相当,并且脂质含量与对急性 WAF 暴露的反应(生存减少)之间的关系遵循相同的趋势:在相同暴露浓度下,富含脂质的桡足类动物比脂质贫乏的桡足类动物存活时间更长。就 GST 表达而言,两种物种均表现出浓度依赖性和暴露时间依赖性趋势。然而,就急性毒性数据而言,北极桡足类动物的反应似乎较慢且强度较低。从研究中可以得出结论,温度和脂质含量是评估温带和北极物种之间差异的重要因素,并且需要对适应低温的生物体的延迟反应进行校正,以将来自其他最佳温度物种的毒性数据外推用于北极环境。