• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌乳杆菌中广泛分布的溶原性代表了发酵乳制品行业的潜在高风险。

Widely distributed lysogeny in probiotic lactobacilli represents a potentially high risk for the fermentative dairy industry.

机构信息

Instituto de Lactología Industrial (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET), Santiago del Estero 2829, S3000AOM Santa Fe, Argentina.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 5;144(3):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.009
PMID:21131090
Abstract

Prophages account for most of the genetic diversity among strains of a given bacterial species, and represent a latent source for the generation of virulent phages. In this work, a set of 30 commercial, collection and dairy-isolated Lactobacillus casei group strains were used. A species-specific PCR assay allowed a reclassification, mainly of strains previously considered Lactobacillus casei, into either Lactobacillus paracasei or Lactobacillus rhamnosus. All the strains were induced with mitomycin C, allowing direct recovering of phage DNA in 25 cases, which corroborates the widely occurrence of lysogeny on Lactobacillus genomes, including probiotic strains of Lactobacillus casei group. Ten out of 11 commercial strains studied contained prophages, evidencing the potential risks of their use at industrial scale. Strains were also induced by treatment with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide but, however, this agent was not able to evidence a prophage release for any of the strains tested. According to a RAPD-PCR fingerprinting with M13, 1254 and G1 primers, most of the commercial strains presented a high degree of homology and, regarding BglII- and BamHI-restriction profiles of phage DNA, six of them harboured the same prophage. Surprisingly, both Lactobacillus paracasei ATCC 27092 and Lactobacillus paracasei ATCC 27139 shared a second prophage with both an INLAIN collection and a commercial Lactobacillus paracasei strains, whereas two collection strains shared a third one. On the other hand, mitomycin C-inducible prophages were detected only on about a half of the strains isolated from dairy products, which had (with only one exception) from moderate to high correlation coefficients according to RAPD-PCR fingerprinting. After induction, supernatants were filtered and tested against nine Lactobacillus strains of the set sensitive to previously assayed virulent phages, allowing isolation of two new virulent phages: ф iLp1308 and ф iLp84. Both phages were able to lyse all but one strains sensitive to previously assayed phage MLC-A.

摘要

原噬菌体在给定细菌物种的菌株中占大多数遗传多样性,并代表了产生毒性噬菌体的潜在来源。在这项工作中,使用了一组 30 种商业、收集和乳制品分离的乳杆菌属乳杆菌组菌株。种特异性 PCR 检测允许重新分类,主要是将先前被认为是乳杆菌乳杆菌的菌株分类为副干酪乳杆菌或鼠李糖乳杆菌。所有菌株均用丝裂霉素 C 诱导,在 25 种情况下可直接回收噬菌体 DNA,这证实了溶原性在乳杆菌基因组中广泛存在,包括乳杆菌属乳杆菌组的益生菌株。在所研究的 11 种商业菌株中有 10 种含有原噬菌体,这表明其在工业规模上使用的潜在风险。用不同浓度的过氧化氢处理也诱导了菌株,但该试剂未能证明任何测试菌株的噬菌体释放。根据 M13、1254 和 G1 引物的 RAPD-PCR 指纹分析,大多数商业菌株具有高度的同源性,并且关于噬菌体 DNA 的 BglII 和 BamHI 限制图谱,其中 6 种含有相同的原噬菌体。令人惊讶的是,副干酪乳杆菌 ATCC 27092 和副干酪乳杆菌 ATCC 27139 与 INLAIN 集合和商业副干酪乳杆菌菌株共享第二个原噬菌体,而两个集合菌株共享第三个原噬菌体。另一方面,仅从乳制品中分离出的菌株中约有一半检测到丝裂霉素 C 诱导的原噬菌体,根据 RAPD-PCR 指纹分析,这些菌株具有从中等到高度相关系数。诱导后,将上清液过滤并针对该组中对先前检测到的毒性噬菌体敏感的 9 种乳杆菌菌株进行测试,允许分离出两种新的毒性噬菌体:ф iLp1308 和 ф iLp84。两种噬菌体都能够裂解除对先前检测到的噬菌体 MLC-A 敏感的菌株之外的所有菌株。

相似文献

1
Widely distributed lysogeny in probiotic lactobacilli represents a potentially high risk for the fermentative dairy industry.益生菌乳杆菌中广泛分布的溶原性代表了发酵乳制品行业的潜在高风险。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 5;144(3):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
2
A fast PCR-based method for the characterization of prophage profiles in strains of the Lactobacillus casei group.一种基于快速聚合酶链反应的方法,用于鉴定干酪乳杆菌属菌株中的原噬菌体图谱。
J Virol Methods. 2017 Oct;248:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Isolation and phenotypic characterization of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei bacteriophage-resistant mutants.耐噬菌体乳杆菌酪蛋白亚种和副干酪乳杆菌突变体的分离及表型特征。
J Appl Microbiol. 2011 Aug;111(2):371-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05056.x. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
4
Genomic Diversity of Phages Infecting Probiotic Strains of Lactobacillus paracasei.感染副干酪乳杆菌益生菌株的噬菌体的基因组多样性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct 16;82(1):95-105. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02723-15. Print 2016 Jan 1.
5
Characterization of prophages containing "evolved" Dit/Tal modules in the genome of Lactobacillus casei BL23.对包含“进化”Dit/Tal 模块的乳杆菌 BL23 基因组噬菌体的特征描述。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;100(21):9201-9215. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7727-x. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
6
Taxonomic and strain-specific identification of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus 35 within the Lactobacillus casei group.干酪乳杆菌属中益生菌菌株鼠李糖乳杆菌35的分类及菌株特异性鉴定。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2679-89. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02286-07. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
7
Diversity and evolution of Lactobacillus casei group isolated from fermented dairy products in Tibet.从西藏发酵乳制品中分离的干酪乳杆菌群的多样性与进化
Arch Microbiol. 2018 Sep;200(7):1111-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00203-018-1528-9. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
Phage-related DNA polymorphism in dairy and probiotic Lactobacillus.乳制品及益生菌乳酸杆菌中与噬菌体相关的DNA多态性
Micron. 2001 Jan;32(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/s0968-4328(00)00030-5.
9
Reclassification of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 15820 as Lactobacillus zeae nom. rev., designation of ATCC 334 as the neotype of L. casei subsp. casei, and rejection of the name Lactobacillus paracasei.干酪乳杆菌干酪亚种ATCC 393和鼠李糖乳杆菌ATCC 15820重新分类为玉米乳杆菌(Lactobacillus zeae)(名称修订),指定ATCC 334作为干酪乳杆菌干酪亚种的新模式菌株,并废弃副干酪乳杆菌这一名称。
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996 Jan;46(1):337-40. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-337.
10
PCR method for detection and identification of Lactobacillus casei/paracasei bacteriophages in dairy products.用于检测和鉴定乳制品中干酪乳杆菌/副干酪乳杆菌噬菌体的聚合酶链反应方法。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 May 31;124(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacteria exploit viral dormancy to establish CRISPR-Cas immunity.细菌利用病毒休眠来建立CRISPR-Cas免疫。
Cell Host Microbe. 2025 Mar 12;33(3):330-340.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2025.02.001. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Occurrence and genetic diversity of prophage sequences identified in the genomes of L. casei group bacteria.在干酪乳杆菌群细菌的基因组中鉴定出噬菌体序列的发生和遗传多样性。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35823-z.
3
Genomic diversity of genus .属的基因组多样性。
Microb Genom. 2022 Jul;8(7). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000847.
4
Safety Assessment of (formerly ) plantarum Q180.(原)植物乳杆菌 Q180 的安全性评估。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 28;31(10):1420-1429. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2106.06066.
5
Bacteriophages-a new hope or a huge problem in the food industry.噬菌体——食品工业中的新希望还是巨大问题
AIMS Microbiol. 2019 Oct 24;5(4):324-346. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.324. eCollection 2019.
6
The enemy from within: a prophage of Roseburia intestinalis systematically turns lytic in the mouse gut, driving bacterial adaptation by CRISPR spacer acquisition.来自内部的敌人:肠道罗斯伯里氏菌的一种噬菌体在小鼠肠道中系统地转为裂解状态,通过 CRISPR 间隔区获取驱动细菌适应。
ISME J. 2020 Mar;14(3):771-787. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0566-x. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Screening and characterization of prophages in Desulfovibrio genomes.脱硫弧菌基因组中噬菌体的筛选和特性分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 18;8(1):9273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27423-z.
8
Changes in Environmental Conditions Modify Infection Kinetics of Dairy Phages.环境条件的变化会改变乳制品噬菌体的感染动力学。
Food Environ Virol. 2017 Sep;9(3):270-276. doi: 10.1007/s12560-017-9296-2. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
A novel chimeric prophage vB_LdeS-phiJB from commercial Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus.一种来自市售德氏乳杆菌保加利亚亚种的新型嵌合原噬菌体vB_LdeS-phiJB。
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 May;43(5):681-9. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1739-5. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
10
Genomic Diversity of Phages Infecting Probiotic Strains of Lactobacillus paracasei.感染副干酪乳杆菌益生菌株的噬菌体的基因组多样性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct 16;82(1):95-105. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02723-15. Print 2016 Jan 1.