Suppr超能文献

单人如何用手动复苏器提供足够的潮气量?一种可提供常规潮气量的改良装置。

How can a single rescuer adequately deliver tidal volume with a manual resuscitator? An improved device for delivering regular tidal volume.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Jan;28(1):40-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.099911. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A bag-valve mask (BVM) device is used as one of the first-line pieces of equipment in emergency situations. However, cardiopulmonary support providers do not recognise the exact tidal volume during procedures, and squeezing methods of BVM may not deliver the same tidal volume each time. To supply a regular and sustained tidal volume, adequate finger points were marked on the surface of a BVM.

METHODS

In this study, a total of 83 volunteers participated and practised conventional BVM and volume-marked bag-valve mask (VBVM) procedures. The VBVM is simply a conventional BVM with an imaginary axis grid, drawn to guide the placement of the fingers. The VBVM method provides a constant volume of approximately 500-600 ml; the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger touch slightly. The results were then statistically analysed.

RESULTS

The tidal volume delivered by the studied VBVM method is more accurate than the conventional BVM method (421.87±95.19 ml vs 534.21±24.22 ml, p<0.001). There was no statistical correlation except age between the results and the participants' training level or physical characteristics in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

As the conventional BVM method cannot deliver a regular and sustained tidal volume, the authors invented the VBVM method. This method delivered a volume of 500-600 ml with more stability each time, which can improve the outcome of emergency patients.

摘要

目的

作为急救情况下的一线设备之一, 球囊面罩(BVM) 装置被广泛应用。 然而,心肺复苏支持者在操作过程中无法准确识别潮气量, 并且每次挤压 BVM 的方法可能无法输送相同的潮气量。为了提供常规且持续的潮气量, 我们在 BVM 表面标记了足够的指压点。

方法

在这项研究中, 共有 83 名志愿者参与并练习了常规 BVM 和容积标记式球囊面罩(VBVM) 操作。VBVM 只是在常规 BVM 上增加了一条想象中的轴线网格, 以指导手指的放置。VBVM 方法可提供约 500-600ml 的恒定容积; 挤压气囊直至拇指和中指轻轻接触。然后对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

与常规 BVM 方法相比, 所研究的 VBVM 方法输送的潮气量更准确(421.87±95.19ml 比 534.21±24.22ml, p<0.001)。除了年龄之外, 研究中参与者的培训水平或身体特征与结果之间没有统计学相关性。

结论

由于常规 BVM 方法无法输送常规且持续的潮气量, 因此作者发明了 VBVM 方法。这种方法每次输送 500-600ml 的容量更稳定, 可以提高急救患者的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验