Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medical Services, Honam University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195826. eCollection 2018.
Unrecognized endobronchial intubation frequently occurs after emergency intubation. However, no study has evaluated the effect of one-lung ventilation on end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We compared the hemodynamic parameters, blood gases, and ETCO2 during one-lung ventilation with those during conventional two-lung ventilation in a pig model of CPR, to determine the effect of the former on ETCO2. A randomized crossover study was conducted in 12 pigs intubated with double-lumen endobronchial tube to achieve lung separation. During CPR, the animals underwent three 5-min ventilation trials based on a randomized crossover design: left-lung, right-lung, or two-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gases were measured at the end of each ventilation trial. Ventilation was provided using the same tidal volume throughout the ventilation trials. Comparison using generalized linear mixed model revealed no significant group effects with respect to aortic pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, and carotid blood flow; however, significant group effect in terms of ETCO2 was found (P < 0.001). In the post hoc analyses, ETCO2 was lower during the right-lung ventilation than during the two-lung (P = 0.006) or left-lung ventilation (P < 0.001). However, no difference in ETCO2 was detected between the left-lung and two-lung ventilations. The partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), and oxygen saturation (SaO2) differed among the three types of ventilation (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). The post hoc analyses revealed a higher PaCO2, lower PaO2, and lower SaO2 during right-lung ventilation than during two-lung or left-lung ventilation. However, the levels of these blood gases did not differ between the left-lung and two-lung ventilations. In a pig model of CPR, ETCO2 was significantly lower during right-lung ventilation than during two-lung ventilation. However, interestingly, ETCO2 during left-lung ventilation was comparable to that during two-lung ventilation.
在紧急插管后,经常会发生支气管内插管无法识别的情况。然而,目前尚无研究评估单肺通气对心肺复苏期间呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO2)的影响。我们比较了心肺复苏期间单肺通气与常规双肺通气的血流动力学参数、血气和 ETCO2,以确定前者对 ETCO2 的影响。在 12 头双腔支气管插管的猪心肺复苏模型中进行了一项随机交叉研究,以实现肺隔离。在心肺复苏期间,动物根据随机交叉设计进行了三次 5 分钟通气试验:左肺通气、右肺通气或双肺通气。在每次通气试验结束时测量动脉血气。在整个通气试验中,使用相同的潮气量进行通气。使用广义线性混合模型进行的比较显示,在主动脉压、冠状动脉灌注压和颈动脉血流量方面,各组之间没有显著的组间效应;然而,在 ETCO2 方面发现了显著的组间效应(P < 0.001)。在事后分析中,右肺通气时 ETCO2 低于双肺通气(P = 0.006)或左肺通气(P < 0.001)。然而,左肺通气和双肺通气时 ETCO2 无差异。三种通气方式的动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、动脉氧分压(PaO2)和氧饱和度(SaO2)不同(P = 0.003,P = 0.001 和 P = 0.001)。事后分析显示,右肺通气时 PaCO2 较高,PaO2 较低,SaO2 较低。然而,左肺通气和双肺通气时这些血气水平无差异。在心肺复苏的猪模型中,右肺通气时 ETCO2 明显低于双肺通气。然而,有趣的是,左肺通气时 ETCO2 与双肺通气时相当。