• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

试验间重复影响感知:集中注意力的作用。

Intertrial repetition affects perception: the role of focused attention.

作者信息

Yashar Amit, Lamy Dominique

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Vis. 2010 Dec 3;10(14):3. doi: 10.1167/10.14.3.

DOI:10.1167/10.14.3
PMID:21131563
Abstract

Implicit short-term memory plays an important role in visual search. For instance, singleton search is faster when the target and distractor features repeat on two consecutive trials than when they switch, an effect called Priming of Popout (PoP). However, whether or not PoP facilitates early perceptual/attentional processes remains controversial. To resolve discrepancies between existing findings, we tested the hypothesis that early effects of PoP occur only if attention is focused/engaged on the target. We measured search accuracy using brief displays for a fine discrimination task, which required focused attention, and for a left/right hemifield localization task, which did not. We found that PoP effects on accuracy occur only in the discrimination task. The theoretical implications are discussed.

摘要

内隐短期记忆在视觉搜索中起着重要作用。例如,当目标和干扰项特征在连续两次试验中重复时,单一特征搜索比它们切换时更快,这种效应称为弹出式启动(PoP)。然而,PoP是否促进早期感知/注意过程仍存在争议。为了解决现有研究结果之间的差异,我们测试了这样一个假设,即只有当注意力集中在目标上时,PoP的早期效应才会出现。我们使用简短显示来测量搜索准确性,用于需要集中注意力的精细辨别任务,以及不需要集中注意力的左右半视野定位任务。我们发现,PoP对准确性的影响仅出现在辨别任务中。本文讨论了其理论意义。

相似文献

1
Intertrial repetition affects perception: the role of focused attention.试验间重复影响感知:集中注意力的作用。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 3;10(14):3. doi: 10.1167/10.14.3.
2
Visual consciousness and intertrial feature priming.视觉意识与试次间特征启动
J Vis. 2013 Apr 1;13(5):1. doi: 10.1167/13.5.1.
3
A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects.一种关于试间启动效应的双阶段解释。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
4
The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?启动机制:情景检索还是突显启动?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):324-39. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?凸显启动的机制:存储表征还是特征增益调制?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jul;71(5):1059-71. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1059.
6
Evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying attentional priming and sensory memory for bistable perception.双稳态感知中注意启动和感觉记忆背后不同机制的证据。
J Vis. 2015 Aug 1;15(11):8. doi: 10.1167/15.11.8.
7
Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.重复干扰项集可改善半侧空间忽视患者的视觉搜索表现。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Mar 7;46(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.020. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
8
Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time.时间位置启动:最近经验的记忆痕迹会影响时间上注意力的分配。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1443-56. doi: 10.1037/a0031231. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.试验间重复促进时间选择:空间和时间搜索的共同机制。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):243-51. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357928. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
10
Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?特征和维度的试验间效应能否由单一理论来解释?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1417-40. doi: 10.1037/a0011386.

引用本文的文献

1
Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.特征性试次间启动会引导注意力吗?尚无定论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):369-393. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01997-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models.启动中trial-to-trial 效应的比较:计算更新模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 3;17(9):e1009332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009332. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.
注意真的偏向于视觉搜索中的最后一个目标位置吗?注意、反应规则、分心物和眼动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):506-514. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01569-x.
4
Selection and response bias as determinants of priming of pop-out search: Revelations from diffusion modeling.选择和反应偏差作为突显搜索启动的决定因素:来自扩散建模的启示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1482-1.
5
The necessity to choose causes the effects of reward on saccade preparation.选择的必要性导致了奖励对眼跳准备的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 5;7(1):16966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17164-w.
6
Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.特征单例独立于特征启动吸引空间注意力。
J Vis. 2017 Aug 1;17(9):7. doi: 10.1167/17.9.7.
7
Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.试验间启动不会影响非对称视觉搜索中的注意优先级。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 29;5:957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00957. eCollection 2014.
8
Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.模拟选择历史对弹出式视觉搜索的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089996. eCollection 2014.
9
The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.视觉搜索启动的边界条件:从被动观看到与任务相关的工作记忆负荷。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):514-21. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0375-6.