• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟选择历史对弹出式视觉搜索的影响。

Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.

作者信息

Tseng Yuan-Chi, Glaser Joshua I, Caddigan Eamon, Lleras Alejandro

机构信息

Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America; Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089996. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089996
PMID:24595032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3940711/
Abstract

While attentional effects in visual selection tasks have traditionally been assigned "top-down" or "bottom-up" origins, more recently it has been proposed that there are three major factors affecting visual selection: (1) physical salience, (2) current goals and (3) selection history. Here, we look further into selection history by investigating Priming of Pop-out (POP) and the Distractor Preview Effect (DPE), two inter-trial effects that demonstrate the influence of recent history on visual search performance. Using the Ratcliff diffusion model, we model observed saccadic selections from an oddball search experiment that included a mix of both POP and DPE conditions. We find that the Ratcliff diffusion model can effectively model the manner in which selection history affects current attentional control in visual inter-trial effects. The model evidence shows that bias regarding the current trial's most likely target color is the most critical parameter underlying the effect of selection history. Our results are consistent with the view that the 3-item color-oddball task used for POP and DPE experiments is best understood as an attentional decision making task.

摘要

虽然在视觉选择任务中,注意力效应传统上被归因于“自上而下”或“自下而上”的起源,但最近有人提出,影响视觉选择的主要因素有三个:(1)物理显著性,(2)当前目标,以及(3)选择历史。在这里,我们通过研究弹出式启动(POP)和干扰项预览效应(DPE)来进一步探究选择历史,这两种试验间效应展示了近期历史对视觉搜索性能的影响。使用拉特克利夫扩散模型,我们对来自一个包括POP和DPE条件混合的异常球搜索实验中观察到的扫视选择进行建模。我们发现,拉特克利夫扩散模型可以有效地模拟选择历史在视觉试验间效应中影响当前注意力控制的方式。模型证据表明,关于当前试验最可能目标颜色的偏差是选择历史效应背后最关键的参数。我们的结果与这样一种观点一致,即用于POP和DPE实验的三项颜色异常球任务最好被理解为一种注意力决策任务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/999c79e573de/pone.0089996.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/872ca86f2527/pone.0089996.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/98731ff43cba/pone.0089996.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/eb91904e998a/pone.0089996.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/3760193b17a1/pone.0089996.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/999c79e573de/pone.0089996.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/872ca86f2527/pone.0089996.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/98731ff43cba/pone.0089996.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/eb91904e998a/pone.0089996.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/3760193b17a1/pone.0089996.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd9a/3940711/999c79e573de/pone.0089996.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.模拟选择历史对弹出式视觉搜索的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089996. eCollection 2014.
2
Selection and response bias as determinants of priming of pop-out search: Revelations from diffusion modeling.选择和反应偏差作为突显搜索启动的决定因素:来自扩散建模的启示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1482-1.
3
Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.弹出式搜索中的扫视排斥:目标的可疑历史如何使眼睛远离它。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 6;10(14):9. doi: 10.1167/10.14.9.
4
Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.在遗传性单纯小脑共济失调中,自上而下而非自下而上的视觉扫描受到影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e116181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116181. eCollection 2014.
5
Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.对扫视目标选择的早期自上而下控制:来自系统显著性差异操纵的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):367-82. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0592-0.
6
Short-term priming, concurrent processing, and saccade curvature during a target selection task in the monkey.猴子在目标选择任务中的短期启动、并行处理和扫视曲率
Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):785-800. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00287-x.
7
Which can explain the pip-and-pop effect during a visual search: Multisensory integration or the oddball effect?这一视觉搜索中的“噼啪”效应可以用多感觉整合还是用异常刺激效应来解释?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 May;47(5):689-703. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000905.
8
Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models.启动中trial-to-trial 效应的比较:计算更新模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 3;17(9):e1009332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009332. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?凸显启动的机制:存储表征还是特征增益调制?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jul;71(5):1059-71. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1059.
10
Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.选择历史会持续改变注意力过滤设置,且不受自上而下控制的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2017 May;54(5):736-754. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12830. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational modelling reveals the influence of object similarity and proximity on visually guided movements.计算建模揭示了物体相似性和接近度对视觉引导运动的影响。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 25;13:e18953. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18953. eCollection 2025.
2
Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.连续动作与神经生物学启发的计算方法揭示了选择历史的动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 17;19(7):e1011283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011283. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Selection history influences an attentional decision bias toward singleton targets.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial history effects in the ventral attentional network.腹侧注意网络中的试验历史效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Dec;26(12):2789-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00678. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
2
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
3
Visual consciousness and intertrial feature priming.视觉意识与试次间特征启动
选择历史会影响对单一目标的注意决策偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):825-833. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02627-8. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset.附加单一目标任务中的经典视觉搜索效应:一个开放数据集
J Cogn. 2021 Jul 28;4(1):34. doi: 10.5334/joc.182. eCollection 2021.
5
Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.解决注意力捕获争论的进展。
Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
Selection and response bias as determinants of priming of pop-out search: Revelations from diffusion modeling.选择和反应偏差作为突显搜索启动的决定因素:来自扩散建模的启示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1482-1.
7
The effect of noise-induced variance on parameter recovery from reaction times.噪声诱导方差对从反应时间恢复参数的影响。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Mar 31;17:147. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0993-x.
8
Not all "distractor" tags are created equal: using a search asymmetry to dissociate the inter-trial effects caused by different forms of distractors.并非所有“干扰”标签都是一样的:利用搜索不对称性来区分不同形式干扰物所引起的试验间效应。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 30;5:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00669. eCollection 2014.
J Vis. 2013 Apr 1;13(5):1. doi: 10.1167/13.5.1.
4
Orientation search is mediated by distractor suppression: evidence from priming of pop-out.定向搜索由干扰抑制介导:来自弹出式启动效应的证据。
Vision Res. 2013 Apr 5;81:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
Rewarding context accelerates implicit guidance in visual search.奖励情境可加速视觉搜索中的内隐引导。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Feb;75(2):287-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0400-2.
6
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.自上而下与自下而上的注意控制:一个失败的理论二分法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
7
From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.从凸显到眼跳:视觉搜索的多选门控随机累积器模型。
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3433-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4622-11.2012.
8
Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.学习价值放大基于突显的注意力捕获。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027926. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
9
When age is irrelevant: distractor inhibition and target activation in priming of pop-out.当年龄无关紧要时:突显启动中的分心物抑制和目标激活。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 May;67(3):325-30. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr114. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
10
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.