• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.扩展默顿规范:科学家对研究规范的认同
J Higher Educ. 2010 May 1;81(3):366-393. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095.
2
Chinese scientists' mediated participation in public outreach: Multiple direct and personal norm-mediated predictors.中国科学家的中介参与公众外展:多个直接和个人规范中介预测因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Nov;33(8):1009-1026. doi: 10.1177/09636625241237927. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
The Normative Orientations of Climate Scientists.气候科学家的规范取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Oct;23(5):1351-1367. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9605-1. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
4
Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.感知行为控制的调节作用:科学家的态度、规范和公众参与意愿。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275643. eCollection 2022.
5
Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.科学中的规范失调:美国科学家全国性调查结果
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
6
Beyond the sheltering academic silo: Norms for scientists' participation in policy.超越庇护学术筒仓:科学家参与政策的规范。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):29-44. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
7
How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.美国赠地大学的制度因素如何影响科学家的公共学术活动。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Feb;32(2):124-142. doi: 10.1177/09636625221094413. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.科学家与传播学学者对于科学家公众参与活动的观点比较。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/0963662518797002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.扰乱默顿:开放科学实践与默顿价值观的交叉点。
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):428-455. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
10
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Altered Voluntary Cooperative Norms Compliance Under Equal Decision-Making Power.经颅直流电刺激在同等决策权下改变了自愿合作规范的遵守情况。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:265. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00265. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers' Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries.协调科学价值观与研究诚信:对四个国家研究人员认知与实践的一项研究
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jun 2;31(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00539-y.
2
Endorsement of scientific norms among non-scientists: The role of science news consumption, political ideology, and science field.非科学家对科学规范的认可:科学新闻消费、政治意识形态和科学领域的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Aug;34(6):752-769. doi: 10.1177/09636625251315882. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture.调查可疑研究行为、科学规范与组织文化之间的联系。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Oct 14;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00151-x.
4
Factors Assessing Science's Self-Presentation model and their effect on conservatives' and liberals' support for funding science.评估科学的自我呈现模型的因素及其对保守派和自由派支持科学资金的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 19;120(38):e2213838120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213838120. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.扰乱默顿:开放科学实践与默顿价值观的交叉点。
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):428-455. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
6
Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.透明、开放、可重现的预防科学。
Prev Sci. 2022 Jul;23(5):701-722. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01336-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.可疑研究行为、研究不端行为及其潜在解释因素的流行程度:荷兰学术研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0263023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263023. eCollection 2022.
8
Development of a Framework for the Culture of Scientific Research.科研文化建设框架的构建
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar65. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-02-0029.
9
Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts.摘要同行评审中与国家和机构相关的地位偏差证据不足。
Elife. 2021 Mar 18;10:e64561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64561.
10
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).心理学领域透明度和可重复性相关研究实践的流行度评估(2014-2017)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):239-251. doi: 10.1177/1745691620979806. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.竞争对科学家工作及人际关系产生的不良影响。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):437-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
2
Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.科学家对组织公正的认知与自我报告的不当行为。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Mar;1(1):51-66. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
3
Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.正常的不当行为:科学家们谈论研究伦理
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Mar;1(1):43-50. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
4
Scientists behaving badly.行为不端的科学家。
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
5
Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior.社会规范与身份相关性:规范行为的动机性方法
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Oct;30(10):1295-309. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264480.
6
Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students.大学教师和博士生的规范取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Oct;6(4):443-61; discussion 463-5. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0002-6.
7
Science and social structure: a festschrift for Robert K. Merton.科学与社会结构:献给罗伯特·K. 默顿的纪念文集。
Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1980;39:1-173.

扩展默顿规范:科学家对研究规范的认同

Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.

作者信息

Anderson Melissa S, Ronning Emily A, Devries Raymond, Martinson Brian C

机构信息

Professor of Higher Education, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

J Higher Educ. 2010 May 1;81(3):366-393. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095.

DOI:10.1353/jhe.0.0095
PMID:21132074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2995462/
Abstract

This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.

摘要

基于焦点小组和全国性调查的这项分析,评估了科学家对默顿科学规范及相关反规范的认同情况。它还支持将这些规范扩展至治理(而非行政)领域,作为一种决策规范,以及扩展至质量(而非数量)领域,作为一种评估规范。