扩展默顿规范：科学家对研究规范的认同
Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.
作者信息
Anderson Melissa S, Ronning Emily A, Devries Raymond, Martinson Brian C
机构信息
Professor of Higher Education, University of Minnesota.
出版信息
J Higher Educ. 2010 May 1;81(3):366-393. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095.
Abstract
This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.
摘要
基于焦点小组和全国性调查的这项分析，评估了科学家对默顿科学规范及相关反规范的认同情况。它还支持将这些规范扩展至治理（而非行政）领域，作为一种决策规范，以及扩展至质量（而非数量）领域，作为一种评估规范。
相似文献
1
Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.
J Higher Educ. 2010 May 1;81(3):366-393. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095.
2
Chinese scientists' mediated participation in public outreach: Multiple direct and personal norm-mediated predictors.
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Nov;33(8):1009-1026. doi: 10.1177/09636625241237927. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
The Normative Orientations of Climate Scientists.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Oct;23(5):1351-1367. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9605-1. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
4
Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275643. eCollection 2022.
5
Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
6
Beyond the sheltering academic silo: Norms for scientists' participation in policy.
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):29-44. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
7
How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Feb;32(2):124-142. doi: 10.1177/09636625221094413. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/0963662518797002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):428-455. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
10
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Altered Voluntary Cooperative Norms Compliance Under Equal Decision-Making Power.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:265. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00265. eCollection 2018.
引用本文的文献
1
Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers' Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jun 2;31(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00539-y.
2
Endorsement of scientific norms among non-scientists: The role of science news consumption, political ideology, and science field.
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Aug;34(6):752-769. doi: 10.1177/09636625251315882. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture.
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Oct 14;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00151-x.
4
Factors Assessing Science's Self-Presentation model and their effect on conservatives' and liberals' support for funding science.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 19;120(38):e2213838120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213838120. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):428-455. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
6
Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.
Prev Sci. 2022 Jul;23(5):701-722. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01336-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0263023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263023. eCollection 2022.
8
Development of a Framework for the Culture of Scientific Research.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Dec;20(4):ar65. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-02-0029.
9
Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts.
Elife. 2021 Mar 18;10:e64561. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64561.
10
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):239-251. doi: 10.1177/1745691620979806. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
本文引用的文献
1
The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):437-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
2
Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Mar;1(1):51-66. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
3
Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Mar;1(1):43-50. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
4
Scientists behaving badly.
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
5
Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Oct;30(10):1295-309. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264480.
6
Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Oct;6(4):443-61; discussion 463-5. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0002-6.
7
Science and social structure: a festschrift for Robert K. Merton.
Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1980;39:1-173.
Zotero 插件