Department of Radiology, Shanghai Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical Center of Fudan University (formally Shanghai Medical University), 83 Fenyang Rd, 200031, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 May;268(5):677-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1441-6. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
The aim of this study was to examine and assess the comparative values of HRCT-based multiplanar reformation (MPR), volume rendering (VR) and virtual endoscope built on three-dimensional shaded-surface display (SSD-based CTVE) for evaluations of the ossicular chain. The normal pure tone audiograms, type-A tympanogram, and normal HRCT characteristics of 32 human ears of 18 patients were reviewed, whose ossicular chains were reconstructed with the three aforementioned protocols and assessed via the 3-point scoring system. The HRCT-based protocols could demonstrate a 3D image of the ossicular chain, except that of the footplate on the SSD-based CTVE. On the qualitative assessment, the efficacy of the MPR and VR, which were both superior to the SSD-based CTVE (P < 0.05), presented no statistical significance among the major and/or hyperdense structures (P > 0.05). As regards the lateral process of the malleus, VR was found to be significantly superior to the MPR and SSD-based CTVE (P < 0.05), both of which, however, showed no significant comparative differences (P > 0.05). Moreover, the three protocols in terms of efficacy were comparatively different in their representations of the anterior crus and footplates of the stapes, respectively (P < 0.05). On the MPR images, not all the images of the lenticular process were ideal; 20 of 32 cases were detected, but not defined. VR could be the more valuable protocol for the 3D reconstruction of the ossicular chain and ought to be more employed in future, especially for the education.
本研究旨在探讨和评估基于高分辨率 CT(HRCT)的多平面重建(MPR)、容积再现(VR)和基于三维表面遮盖显示(SSD)的虚拟内窥镜(CTVE)在评估听小骨链中的比较价值。回顾了 18 例患者的 32 个人耳的正常纯音听力图、A型鼓室图和正常 HRCT 特征,采用上述三种方案对其听小骨链进行重建,并采用 3 分制评分系统进行评估。基于 HRCT 的方案除了在 SSD 基 CTVE 上无法显示镫骨底板的 3D 图像外,还可以显示听小骨链的 3D 图像。在定性评估中,MPR 和 VR 的效果均优于 SSD 基 CTVE(P<0.05),但对于主要和/或高密度结构(P>0.05),两者之间无统计学意义。至于锤骨外侧突,VR 明显优于 MPR 和 SSD 基 CTVE(P<0.05),但两者之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,这三种方案在表示锤骨前突和镫骨前、后脚方面的效果也存在差异(P<0.05)。在 MPR 图像上,并非所有的晶状体突图像都理想;32 例中,20 例可检测,但无法定义。VR 可能是评估听小骨链的更有价值的方案,应该在未来更多地使用,特别是在教育方面。