NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):935-44. doi: 10.1037/a0020974.
Providers of mental health services need tools to screen for acute psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for transition to psychosis in help-seeking individuals. In this study, the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI) was examined as a screening tool and for its ability to correctly predict diagnostic group membership (e.g., help seeking, mild psychiatric complaints, highly symptomatic mood or anxiety disorder, UHR, acute psychosis). Diagnostic evaluation with established instruments was used for diagnosis in 3 research samples. UHR status was assessed with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms/Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (Miller et al., 1999) and the Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms Prediction list (Gross, Huber, Klosterkötter, & Linz, 1987; Klosterkötter, Hellmich, Steinmeyer, & Schulze-Lutter, 2001). This study showed that members of different diagnostic groups rate themselves significantly differently on the ESI and its subscales. A new subscale was constructed, the UHR-Psychosis scale, that showed good utility in detecting individuals with interview-diagnosed UHR status and acute psychosis. The scale is also sensitive to the threshold between UHR and acute psychosis. Practical applications of the ESI include use as a diagnostic tool within various settings.
精神卫生服务提供者需要工具来筛查急性精神病和向精神病转变的超高风险 (UHR),以便对寻求帮助的个体进行筛查。在这项研究中,埃彭多夫精神分裂症量表 (ESI) 被用作筛查工具,并评估其正确预测诊断组别的能力(例如,寻求帮助、轻度精神抱怨、高症状情绪或焦虑障碍、UHR、急性精神病)。使用既定工具进行诊断评估,以在 3 个研究样本中进行诊断。使用前驱症状结构化访谈/前驱症状量表 (Miller 等人,1999) 和用于基本症状预测清单评估的波恩量表 (Gross、Huber、Klosterkötter 和 Linz,1987;Klosterkötter、Hellmich、Steinmeyer 和 Schulze-Lutter,2001) 评估 UHR 状态。这项研究表明,不同诊断组别的成员在 ESI 及其子量表上的自我评分存在显著差异。构建了一个新的子量表,UHR-精神病量表,该量表在检测经访谈诊断为 UHR 状态和急性精神病的个体方面具有良好的效用。该量表对 UHR 和急性精神病之间的阈值也很敏感。ESI 的实际应用包括在各种环境中用作诊断工具。