Castleden Heather, Morgan Vanessa Sloan, Neimanis Aelita
School of Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Dec;5(4):23-32. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.23.
Ethical tensions exist regarding the value and practice of acknowledging Indigenous contributions in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Semistructured phone interviews with researchers documented their perspectives on authorship in the scholarly dissemination of their community-based participatory Indigenous research. Thematic analysis resulted in four key ideas: (1) current practices regarding methods of acknowledging community contributions; (2) requirements for shared authorship with individual versus collective/community partners; (3) benefits to sharing authorship with collective/community partners; and (4) risks to sharing authorship with collective/community partners. Findings suggest an emerging but inconsistent practice.
在基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）中，对于承认原住民贡献的价值和实践存在伦理上的紧张关系。对研究人员进行的半结构化电话访谈记录了他们在基于社区的参与性原住民研究学术传播中对署名权的看法。主题分析得出了四个关键观点：（1）当前承认社区贡献方法的实践；（2）与个人而非集体/社区伙伴共同署名的要求；（3）与集体/社区伙伴共同署名的好处；（4）与集体/社区伙伴共同署名的风险。研究结果表明存在一种新兴但不一致的实践。
