Suppr超能文献

一种抽吸物制备系统:一种用于乳腺细针抽吸的新型液基细胞学技术的应用。

An aspiration material preparation system: application of a new liquid-based cytology technique for fine-needle aspiration of the breast.

作者信息

Sakakibara Eiichi, Kimachi Setsuo, Hashimoto Katsunori, Inagaki Hiroshi, Nagasaka Tetsuro, Wakusawa Shinya, Yokoi Toyoharu

机构信息

Department of Cytopathology, Tokoname Municipal Hospital, Tokoname, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2011;55(1):92-9. doi: 10.1159/000320857. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of our original liquid-based cell preparation system AMAPS (aspiration material preparation system) and to compare it with the AutoSmear system in breast aspiration cytology.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 487 specimens of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast were retrieved, of which 250 were processed with AMAPS and 237 with the AutoSmear method (before the introduction of AMAPS). A final histological diagnosis was obtained by an excisional biopsy or a surgical resection in 148 cases.

RESULTS

Cell recovery rates were significantly improved with AMAPS (96.8 and 99.1% in Papanicolaou and Diff-Quik, respectively) compared with the AutoSmear method (40.9 and 42.3%, respectively; p<0.01). Within-run and day-to-day reproducibility of cell recovery was satisfactory, with coefficients of variations of 6.8 and 8.7%, respectively. Following the introduction of AMAPS in breast cytology, the unsatisfactory rate decreased significantly (from 16.0 to 8.8%; p<0.01), while the diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy did not change (97.8 to 98.1%). Moreover, the diagnostic specificity for benign lesions increased from 75 to 93.8%, thus decreasing the excision rate of fibrocystic disease.

CONCLUSION

AMAPS may serve as an alternative to the conventional technique or commercially available liquid-based cytology systems.

摘要

目的

评估我们最初的液基细胞制备系统AMAPS(抽吸材料制备系统)的实用性,并在乳腺抽吸细胞学中与自动涂片系统进行比较。

研究设计

总共检索了487例乳腺细针穿刺细胞学标本,其中250例采用AMAPS处理,237例采用自动涂片法处理(在引入AMAPS之前)。148例通过切除活检或手术切除获得最终组织学诊断。

结果

与自动涂片法相比,AMAPS的细胞回收率显著提高(巴氏染色法和Diff-Quik染色法分别为96.8%和99.1%)(自动涂片法分别为40.9%和42.3%;p<0.01)。细胞回收的批内和日间重复性令人满意,变异系数分别为6.8%和8.7%。在乳腺细胞学中引入AMAPS后,不满意率显著降低(从16.0%降至8.8%;p<0.01),而对恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性没有变化(从97.8%降至98.1%)。此外,对良性病变的诊断特异性从75%提高到93.8%,从而降低了纤维囊性疾病的切除率。

结论

AMAPS可作为传统技术或市售液基细胞学系统的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验