Sakakibara Eiichi, Kimachi Setsuo, Hashimoto Katsunori, Inagaki Hiroshi, Nagasaka Tetsuro, Wakusawa Shinya, Yokoi Toyoharu
Department of Cytopathology, Tokoname Municipal Hospital, Tokoname, Japan.
Acta Cytol. 2011;55(1):92-9. doi: 10.1159/000320857. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
To evaluate the usefulness of our original liquid-based cell preparation system AMAPS (aspiration material preparation system) and to compare it with the AutoSmear system in breast aspiration cytology.
A total of 487 specimens of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast were retrieved, of which 250 were processed with AMAPS and 237 with the AutoSmear method (before the introduction of AMAPS). A final histological diagnosis was obtained by an excisional biopsy or a surgical resection in 148 cases.
Cell recovery rates were significantly improved with AMAPS (96.8 and 99.1% in Papanicolaou and Diff-Quik, respectively) compared with the AutoSmear method (40.9 and 42.3%, respectively; p<0.01). Within-run and day-to-day reproducibility of cell recovery was satisfactory, with coefficients of variations of 6.8 and 8.7%, respectively. Following the introduction of AMAPS in breast cytology, the unsatisfactory rate decreased significantly (from 16.0 to 8.8%; p<0.01), while the diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy did not change (97.8 to 98.1%). Moreover, the diagnostic specificity for benign lesions increased from 75 to 93.8%, thus decreasing the excision rate of fibrocystic disease.
AMAPS may serve as an alternative to the conventional technique or commercially available liquid-based cytology systems.
评估我们最初的液基细胞制备系统AMAPS(抽吸材料制备系统)的实用性,并在乳腺抽吸细胞学中与自动涂片系统进行比较。
总共检索了487例乳腺细针穿刺细胞学标本,其中250例采用AMAPS处理,237例采用自动涂片法处理(在引入AMAPS之前)。148例通过切除活检或手术切除获得最终组织学诊断。
与自动涂片法相比,AMAPS的细胞回收率显著提高(巴氏染色法和Diff-Quik染色法分别为96.8%和99.1%)(自动涂片法分别为40.9%和42.3%;p<0.01)。细胞回收的批内和日间重复性令人满意,变异系数分别为6.8%和8.7%。在乳腺细胞学中引入AMAPS后,不满意率显著降低(从16.0%降至8.8%;p<0.01),而对恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性没有变化(从97.8%降至98.1%)。此外,对良性病变的诊断特异性从75%提高到93.8%,从而降低了纤维囊性疾病的切除率。
AMAPS可作为传统技术或市售液基细胞学系统的替代方法。