• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009-2010 年 H1N1 流感住院病例主动监测系统的效果评估。

A process evaluation of an active surveillance system for hospitalized 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza cases.

机构信息

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fb0071.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fb0071
PMID:21135655
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A process evaluation was conducted to evaluate a newly established active influenza surveillance program that utilized 6 sentinel hospitals to collect epidemiologic information for influenza-like illness admissions. Objectives were to determine whether the new system was implemented successfully and met surveillance objectives, including determination of the proportion of patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza, extent of disease severity, and identifying high-risk groups.

METHODS

Timeliness and data quality were assessed through analysis of electronic case report form completion and timing of specimen collection and submission to public health laboratories for influenza testing. Simplicity and accessibility of the surveillance system were assessed through a survey of hospital-based surveillance staff.

RESULTS

The median number of days from admission to initial reporting was 5 days. The completeness of core variables was more than 98%, 96.2% for complications, and 92.6% for underlying medical conditions. Among influenza-like illness admissions, 77.8% had a specimen submitted for confirmatory testing. Eighty-nine percent of survey respondents found guidance provided by New York State Department of Health to be helpful and case report forms easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

This project was implemented within a context of limited time and resources. Certain aspects of planning, such as securing necessary staffing at some hospitals, could not be carried out prior to implementation. Resource limitations necessitated controls on the numbers of specimens submitted each week. Some reporting lags were noted because of delays in data entry. Reporting timeframes allowed for timely data summarization for internal decision making. Maintaining frequent contact with sentinel sites promoted report completeness, timeliness, and consistency across sites. These results highlight the value of sentinel surveillance methodology and challenges of rapidly deploying a new active surveillance system for an emergent disease.

摘要

目的

进行了一项过程评估,以评估一个新建立的主动流感监测计划,该计划利用 6 家哨点医院收集流感样疾病入院的流行病学信息。目的是确定新系统是否成功实施并达到监测目标,包括确定 2009 年 H1N1 流感患者的比例、疾病严重程度的程度以及确定高风险人群。

方法

通过分析电子病例报告表的完成情况以及标本采集和提交公共卫生实验室进行流感检测的时间,评估及时性和数据质量。通过对医院监测人员的调查,评估监测系统的简单性和可及性。

结果

从入院到首次报告的中位数天数为 5 天。核心变量的完整性超过 98%,并发症为 96.2%,基础疾病为 92.6%。在流感样疾病入院患者中,77.8%的患者提交了用于确认检测的标本。89%的调查受访者认为纽约州卫生部提供的指导很有帮助,病例报告表易于使用。

结论

该项目是在有限的时间和资源的背景下实施的。某些规划方面,例如在某些医院获得必要的人员配置,无法在实施之前进行。资源限制需要对每周提交的标本数量进行控制。由于数据录入延迟,出现了一些报告延迟。报告时间表允许及时汇总数据,以便内部决策。与哨点站点保持频繁联系促进了报告的完整性、及时性和站点之间的一致性。这些结果突出了哨点监测方法的价值以及快速部署针对突发疾病的新主动监测系统的挑战。

相似文献

1
A process evaluation of an active surveillance system for hospitalized 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza cases.2009-2010 年 H1N1 流感住院病例主动监测系统的效果评估。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fb0071.
2
Two distinct surveillance methods to track hospitalized influenza patients in New York State during the 2009-2010 influenza season.2009-2010 流感季节期间,纽约州采用两种不同的监测方法跟踪住院流感患者。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181fb0050.
3
Evaluation of a pilot respiratory virus surveillance system linking electronic health record and diagnostic data.评价一个连接电子健康记录和诊断数据的呼吸道病毒监测系统试点项目。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):322-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182602ef6.
4
Spring 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak in King County, Washington.2009 年春华盛顿州金县甲型 H1N1 流感暴发。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S109-16. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181c6b818.
5
Local influenza-like illness surveillance at a university health system during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间某大学卫生系统的地方性流感样疾病监测。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Sep;40(7):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
6
Fatalities associated with the 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus in New York city.与 2009 年纽约市甲型 H1N1 流感病毒相关的死亡病例。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 1;50(11):1498-504. doi: 10.1086/652446.
7
A sentinel platform to evaluate influenza vaccine effectiveness and new variant circulation, Canada 2010-2011 season.2010-2011 年加拿大流感季节中用于评估流感疫苗效力和新变异株传播的哨点平台。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55(3):332-42. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis431. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
8
Critical analysis of deaths due to atypical pneumonia during the onset of the influenza A (H1N1) virus epidemic.对甲型 H1N1 流感病毒流行期间非典型肺炎死亡的批判性分析。
Arch Med Res. 2009 Nov;40(8):662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.10.010. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
9
[Comparison of sentinel surveillance of influenza like infections in Martinique and in Guadeloupe during influenza A(H1N) 2009 pandemic: use of a phone survey and hospital surveillance].[2009年甲型H1N流感大流行期间马提尼克岛和瓜德罗普岛流感样感染哨点监测的比较:电话调查与医院监测的应用]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Dec;59(6):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
10
Surveillance for influenza--United States, 1997-98, 1998-99, and 1999-00 seasons.美国1997 - 1998、1998 - 1999及1999 - 2000年流感监测情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Oct 25;51(7):1-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognizing flu-like symptoms from videos.从视频中识别流感样症状。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 12;15(1):300. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-300.