School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham.
Br J Sociol. 2010 Dec;61(4):639-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01332.x.
This paper is about tendencies to the subversion of sociology as a discipline. It connects external factors of the wider socio-political environment of higher education in the UK, especially those associated with the audit culture and new systems of governance, with the internal organization of the discipline. While the environment is similar for all social science subjects, the paper argues that there are specific consequences for sociology because of characteristics peculiar to the discipline. The paper discusses these consequences in terms of the changing relationship between sociology and the growing interdisciplinary area of applied social studies as a form of 'mode 2 knowledge'. It argues that while sociology 'exports' concepts, methodologies and personnel it lacks the internal disciplinary integrity of other 'exporter' disciplines, such as economics, political science and anthropology. The consequence is an increasingly blurred distinction between sociology as a discipline and the interdisciplinary area of applied social studies with a potential loss of disciplinary identity. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this loss of identity is associated with a reduced ability to reproduce a critical sensibility within sociology and absorption to the constraints of audit culture with its preferred form of mode 2 knowledge.
本文探讨了社会学作为一门学科被颠覆的趋势。它将英国高等教育更广泛的社会政治环境的外部因素,特别是与审计文化和新治理体系相关的因素,与学科的内部组织联系起来。虽然所有社会科学学科的环境都相似,但本文认为,由于学科的特有特征,社会学面临着特定的后果。本文从社会学与日益增长的应用社会研究跨学科领域之间不断变化的关系,即“模式 2 知识”的角度,讨论了这些后果。它认为,尽管社会学“输出”了概念、方法和人员,但它缺乏经济学、政治学和人类学等其他“输出”学科的内部学科完整性。其结果是,社会学作为一门学科与应用社会研究的跨学科领域之间的界限越来越模糊,可能会失去学科身份。本文最后讨论了这种身份的丧失如何与社会学内部批判性思维能力的下降以及对审计文化及其偏好的模式 2 知识形式的限制的吸收有关。