Department of Sociology. University of Bristol, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2011 Mar;62(1):154-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01353.x.
This paper considers the impact of interdisciplinarity upon sociological research, focusing on one particular case: the academic study of popular music. 'Popular music studies' is an area of research characterized by interdisciplinarity and, in keeping with broader intellectual trends, this approach is assumed to offer significant advantages. As such, popular music studies is broadly typical of contemporary intellectual and governmental attitudes regarding the best way to research specific topics. Such interdisciplinarity, however, has potential costs and this paper highlights one of the most significant: an over-emphasis upon shared substantive interests and subsequent undervaluation of shared epistemological understandings. The end result is a form of 'ghettoization' within sociology itself, with residents of any particular ghetto displaying little awareness of developments in neighbouring ghettos. Reporting from one such ghetto, this paper considers some of the ways in which the sociology of popular music has been limited by its positioning within an interdisciplinary environment and suggests two strategies for developing a more fully-realized sociology of popular music. First, based on the assumption that a sociological understanding of popular music shares much in common with a sociological understanding of everything else, this paper calls for increased intradisciplinary research between sociologists of varying specialisms. The second strategy, however, involves a reconceptualization of the disciplinary limits of sociology, as it argues that a sociology of popular music needs to accept musical specificity as part of its remit. Such acceptance has thus far been limited not only by an interdisciplinary context but also by the long-standing sociological scepticism toward the analysis of aesthetic objects. As such, this paper offers an intervention into wider debates concerning the remit of sociological enquiry, and whether it is ever appropriate for sociological analyses of culture to consider 'internal' aesthetic structures. In relation to the specific case study, the paper argues that considering musical specificity is a necessary component of a sociology of popular music, and some possibilities for developing a 'materialist sociology of music' are outlined.
本文探讨了跨学科性对社会学研究的影响,重点关注一个特定案例:流行音乐的学术研究。“流行音乐研究”是一个具有跨学科性的研究领域,并且与更广泛的知识趋势保持一致,这种方法被认为具有显著的优势。因此,流行音乐研究在很大程度上代表了当代知识分子和政府对于研究特定主题的最佳方式的态度。这种跨学科性可能会带来一些成本,本文强调了其中一个最重要的成本:过于强调共同的实质性利益,随后低估了共同的认识论理解。其结果是社会学本身内部出现了一种“聚居化”形式,任何特定聚居区的居民对邻近聚居区的发展几乎没有意识。本文从一个这样的聚居区出发,探讨了流行音乐社会学在其跨学科环境中的定位所受到的一些限制,并提出了两种发展更全面的流行音乐社会学的策略。首先,基于这样一种假设,即对流行音乐的社会学理解与对其他任何事物的社会学理解有很多共同之处,本文呼吁不同专业领域的社会学家之间加强内部跨学科研究。然而,第二种策略涉及重新构想社会学的学科界限,因为它认为,流行音乐社会学需要接受音乐的特殊性作为其职责的一部分。这种接受不仅受到跨学科背景的限制,还受到社会学对审美对象分析的长期怀疑的限制。因此,本文对更广泛的关于社会学研究范围的争论以及社会学对文化的分析是否应该考虑“内部”美学结构的问题进行了干预。就具体的案例研究而言,本文认为考虑音乐的特殊性是流行音乐社会学的一个必要组成部分,并概述了发展“音乐唯物主义社会学”的一些可能性。