Georgia State University, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, 35 Broad Street, Atlanta, GA 30303-4014, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):695-712. doi: 10.1037/a0021692.
The reciprocal exchange of employees' work for pay that is central to employment relationships is viewed here through the lens of the psychological contract. A psychological contract involves promised inducements, promised contributions, delivered inducements, and delivered contributions: How an employee cognitively integrates these 4 elements is a central question in psychological contract theory. Three alternative approaches for integrating the 4 elements were drawn from discrepancy theory, from equity theory, and from need theories of satisfaction, respectively. Experimental findings disconfirmed the discrepancy and equity approaches. Findings were consistent with the premise of the needs model, which is that appraisal is driven by how psychological contract elements facilitate or hinder an employee's effort to fulfill personal needs. Results showed that promised and delivered pay and work contribute uniquely to appraisal but that they vary in their influence on appraisal. These findings were consistent with the needs model principle that elements proximal to need satisfaction matter more than distal elements. That is, what is delivered (for pay and for work) matters more than what is promised, and pay matters more than work.
这里通过心理契约的视角来看待员工薪酬工作的互惠交换,这是雇佣关系的核心。心理契约涉及承诺的诱因、承诺的贡献、已交付的诱因和已交付的贡献:员工如何认知整合这 4 个要素是心理契约理论的核心问题。分别从差异理论、公平理论和满意度的需求理论中得出了整合这 4 个要素的三种替代方法。实验结果否定了差异和公平的方法。研究结果与需求模型的前提一致,即评估是由心理契约要素促进还是阻碍员工满足个人需求的努力驱动的。研究结果表明,承诺的和已交付的薪酬和工作对评估有独特的贡献,但它们对评估的影响不同。这些发现与需求模型的原则一致,即接近满足需求的要素比遥远的要素更重要。也就是说,交付的(薪酬和工作)比承诺的更重要,薪酬比工作更重要。