McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health, University Health Network and University of Toronto, 101 College Street Suite 406, Toronto ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Dec 13;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-S1-S8.
Since 2000, R&D financing for global health has increased significantly, with innovative proposals for further increases. However, although venture capital (VC) funding has fostered life sciences businesses across the developed world, its application in the developing world and particularly in Africa is relatively new. Is VC feasible in the African context, to foster the development and application of local health innovation?As the most industrially advanced African nation, South Africa serves as a test case for life sciences venture funding. This paper analyzes Bioventures, the first VC company focused on life sciences investment in sub-Saharan Africa. The case study method was used to analyze the formation, operation, and investment support of Bioventures, and to suggest lessons for future health venture funds in Africa that aim to develop health-oriented innovations.
The modest financial success of Bioventures in challenging circumstances has demonstrated a proof of concept that life sciences VC can work in the region. Beyond providing funds, support given to investees included board participation, contacts, and strategic services. Bioventures had to be proactive in finding and supporting good health R&D.Due to the fund's small size, overhead and management expenses were tightly constrained. Bioventures was at times unable to make follow-on investments, being forced instead to give up equity to raise additional capital, and to sell health investments earlier than might have been optimal. With the benefit of hindsight, the CFO of Bioventures felt that partnering with a larger fund might benefit similar future funds. Being better linked to market intelligence and other entrepreneurial investors was also seen as an unmet need.
BioVentures has learned lessons about how the traditional VC model might evolve to tackle health challenges facing Africa, including how to raise funds and educate investors; how to select, value, and support investments; and how to understand the balance between financial and social returns. The experience of the fund suggests that future health funds targeting ailments of the poor might require investors that accept health benefits as part of their overall "return." Learning from Bioventures may help develop health innovation funding for sub-Saharan African that has combined health, financial, and economic development impacts.
自 2000 年以来,全球卫生研发资金大幅增加,提出了进一步增加资金的创新建议。然而,尽管风险投资(VC)为发达国家的生命科学企业提供了支持,但它在发展中国家,尤其是在非洲的应用相对较新。在促进本地卫生创新的发展和应用方面,VC 在非洲背景下是否可行?
南非作为非洲工业化程度最高的国家,是生命科学风险投资资金的试点案例。本文分析了专注于撒哈拉以南非洲地区生命科学投资的第一支 VC 公司 Bioventures。案例研究方法用于分析 Bioventures 的形成、运营和投资支持,并为旨在开发面向卫生的创新的未来非洲健康风险投资基金提供经验教训。
Bioventures 在充满挑战的环境中取得了适度的财务成功,证明了生命科学 VC 在该地区是可行的。除了提供资金外,还为投资对象提供了董事会参与、联系和战略服务。Bioventures 必须积极寻找和支持良好的卫生研发。由于基金规模较小,因此严格限制了管理费用和管理费用。Bioventures 有时无法进行后续投资,而是被迫放弃股权以筹集额外资金,并提前出售卫生投资,而不是最优的情况。事后看来,Bioventures 的首席财务官认为,与更大的基金合作可能会使未来的类似基金受益。更好地与市场情报和其他创业投资者建立联系,也被视为未满足的需求。
Bioventures 了解了传统 VC 模式如何发展以应对非洲面临的卫生挑战的经验教训,包括如何筹集资金和教育投资者;如何选择、评估和支持投资;以及如何理解财务和社会回报之间的平衡。该基金的经验表明,针对贫困人群疾病的未来健康基金可能需要接受健康效益作为其整体“回报”的一部分的投资者。从 Bioventures 吸取的经验教训可能有助于为撒哈拉以南非洲的卫生创新提供资金,从而实现卫生、金融和经济发展的影响。